Skip to main content

Greece: The only "public" in banks is the debt that will be loaded on future generations!

by SCH

Neoliberal dictatorship representatives in Greece continue to spread the propaganda concerning the Greek banks. Various mouthpieces continue to propagate the false perception that the Greek banks are, at the moment, under the state control and some of them claim that this is a proof of the Soviet function of the economy!

The mouthpieces propagate that this is the reason for which they must be privatized again, so that the state should not have the responsibility of their recapitalization and relief taxpayers from such an additional load. In reality, the only thing that will change, according to the best scenario, are the names of the private financial institutions and investors that will take control of the so-called "systemic" banks in the future, while the Greek public will be left with an additional debt.

The purely private nature of the Hellenic Financial Stability Fund (HFSF)

From the HFSF website and the Annual Report for the period 21/7/2010 – 31/12/2011:

The Hellenic Financial Stability Fund (hereinafter the “Fund” or “HFSF”) was founded in July 2010 (under Law 3864/2010) as a private legal entity and does not belong to the public sector. It has administrative and financial autonomy, operates exclusively under the rules of the private economy and is governed by the provisions of the founding law as applicable. In addition, the provisions of company law 2190/1920 are applied as in force, provided they are not contrary to the provisions and the objectives of the founding law of the Fund. The purely private nature of the Fund is neither affected by its entire capital being subscribed by the Greek government, nor by the issuance of the relevant decisions by the Minister of Finance.

In addition, the Fund may provide guarantees to states, international organizations or other beneficiaries and in general may take any action necessary for implementing the decisions made by the bodies of the eurozone with a view to supporting the Greek economy.

Funds for the HFSF

Under the title “Post Balance Sheet Events”, p. 5-6:

On 15/03/2012 The European Financial Stability Facility (hereinafter EFSF), the Greek State, the Fund and the BoG, signed the “Master Financial Assistance Facility Agreement” amounting to a total of € 109 billion and the Fund guarantees on behalf of the Greek State the amount which will be used for the recapitalization of the credit institutions. On 17/04/2012 the Fund signed with the Greek State and the BoG the Acceptance Notice for the deposit EFSF bonds into the Fund’s account amounting to a total of € 25 billion, which pertain to the recapitalization and revitalization of the credit institutions. The Fund’s share capital as of the financial statements’ approval date stood at € 26.5 billion (€ 1.5 billion in initial capital and € 25 billion from an additional capital increase on 19/04/2012). The capital increase took place with the contribution of floating rate notes (FRNs) issued by the EFSF.

Under the title “Prospects”, p.6:

In the following months, it is anticipated that the banks’ recapitalisation will start and will also be the Fund’s main activity for 2012. In order to respond to the capital requirements, the Fund has been reinforced with capital amounting to € 25 billion and is expected to be further enhanced (total authorized capital: € 50 billion), in the context of the loan agreement signed between the HFSF and the Republic of Greece.

Also, according to the “Note 10”, p.29:

The authorised share capital, according to amended L. 3864/10, amounts to € 50 billion resulting from funds which will be raised as part of the mechanism put in place by the European Union and the IMF to support Greece according to L. 3845/2010, and which will be gradually covered from the Greek government and included in non-transferable titles until the expiry of the HFSF. As of 31/12/2011 the paid in share capital totaled € 1.5 billion.

Participation of the HFSF to the Greek “systemic” banks

From the Annual Report for the period 1/1/2012 – 31/12/2012:

In the context of the settlement of the recapitalization, Piraeus Bank returned EFSF FRNs of nominal amount € 499.5m to the HFSF while following the delivery of 4,109,040,164 common registered shares the HFSF’s shareholding in Piraeus Bank reached 81.01%.

Given that the EFSF FRNs already held by Alpha Bank as an advance for its capital increase amounted to € 2,942.0m (nominal amount) the HFSF contributed additional EFSF FRNs of a nominal amount totaling € 1,018.5m. Therefore the total nominal amount of EFSF FRNs given to Alpha Bank were € 3,960.5 and their fair value as of 30/05/2013 was € 4,021.0m. Following the delivery of 9,138,636,364 common registered shares to the HFSF, its shareholding in Alpha Bank stands at 83.70%.

Based on the subscription in cash which reached € 1,079.1m (11% of total) and the fair value of the EFSF FRNs already contributed, NBG returned to the HFSF EFSF FRNs of nominal amount of € 1,291.7m. Following the delivery of 2,022,579,237 common registered shares to the HFSF, its shareholding in NBG stands at 84.39%.

Following the fair valuation performed on the contributed EFSF FRNs, Eurobank returned to the Fund EFSF FRNs with a nominal amount of € 113.2m. Following the delivery of Eurobank’s shares to the HFSF (3,789,317,358 common registered shares), the HFSF’s shareholding in Eurobank stood at 98.56%.

According to the Piraeus bank website, the HFSF held 81% of the outstanding common shares on September 30, 2013, while the Greek Public does not appear anywhere in the shareholder structure of the bank.

According to the Alpha bank website, the HFSF holds 8,925,267,781 common, registered, voting, dematerialized shares, which correspond to 81.71% of the total number of voting shares of the bank on Dec. 31, 2013, while the Greek Public does not appear anywhere in the shareholder structure of the bank.

According to the National Bank of Greece website, on June 30, 2013 shareholders structure, HFSF held 84.4% of the shares while 1% held by “domestic pension funds” and 1.7% by “domestic private and public sector companies”.

According to the Eurobank website, on Nov. 14, 2013, the participation of the HFSF to the bank was 95.2%.

 

BoD composition of the “systemic” banks


Piraeus Bank: 12 of the 16 members of the current board, among them chairman Michael Sallas, were also members since 09/02/11, thus quite long before HFSF participation to the bank. There are two representatives from the HFSF and only one from the Greek Public who, according to the bank's website, are not considered members of the board.

Alpha Bank: All members of the current board, among them chairman Yannis Costopoulos, were also members long before HFSF participation to the bank. There is one representative from the HFSF and only one from the Greek Public.

National Bank of Greece: 8 of the 13 members of the current board, were members long before HFSF participation to the bank, while it is not clear whether the rest 5 members since 2012, among them chairman George Zanias, had become members before or after HFSF participation. There is one representative of the HFSF and only one from the Greek Public.

Eurobank: A new BoD was appointed by the HFSF General Council following a selection process held by an international HR consultant. However, 6 from the 9 members of the new board were also members of the previous BoD consisted of 18 members. There is one representative of the HFSF and only one from the Greek Public.

Conclusions

From the information above, the conclusions are:

  • Most executives of the four “systemic” banks are still members of the boards after the HFSF participation, despite that the Fund holds now the significantly higher percentage of the shares in all of them.
  • Concerning the four “systemic banks”, a new BoD was appointed by the HFSF only in the case of Eurobank at the time where the Fund held 98.56% (now 95.2%) of the shares.
  • HFSF itself is a purely private institution in which the Greek Public has no power.
  • Greek Public's presence in the shareholder composition of the four “systemic” banks is minimal or zero.
  • Greek Public's presence in the BoDs of the four “systemic” banks through representatives is minimal.

It is proven that, the only "public" in the Greek banks are the guarantees by the Greek Public for their recapitalization. This means that, despite that the Greek Public has no power on banks' decisions and their investment choices, it will be called to pay the interest for the loans in the context of the loan agreement between Troika lenders and Greece.

It also means that, no one is able to protect the Greek Public from an additional damage in case that HFSF sell its shares to other banks or investors after a possible share-price significant fall.

It also means that, no one can guarantee deposits, especially after the decisions of the recent EU Summit and ECOFIN for the bail-in, while in case of a new banking crisis, HFSF will suffer significant damage - in case that will still hold the largest part of the banks' shares - because according to the bail-in "rules", shareholders must also participate in the bank rescue. Therefore, according to the best scenario, the Greek Public, as guarantor of the HFSF, will be forced to sign a new loan agreement to cover additional damage thus loaded with additional debt.

So finally, the only "public" in Greek banks is the debt that will be loaded on future generations!

Sources:










Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Capitalism & Genocide - Yanis Varoufakis Speech at the Gaza Tribunal, 23rd October 2025, Istanbul

Yanis Varoufakis   On 23rd October, Yanis Varoufakis testified in front of the Jury of Conscience in the context of the Gaza Tribunal. His speech focused on the economic forces underpinning the genocide of the Palestinian people. In particular, he spoke on the manner in which capitalist dynamics have historically fuelled the white settler colonial project and, more recently, how the accumulation of a new form of capital - which he calls cloud capital - has accelerated, deepened and amplified the economic forces powering and propelling the machinery of genocide. 

Munich Shock: Rubio’s Vision of a New Western Century & World Order

GVS Deep Dive   At the 2026 Munich Security Conference, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio delivered one of the most consequential foreign policy speeches of the year. Framed as a call for Western renewal, his address went far beyond NATO reassurance — outlining a vision of sovereignty, industrial consolidation, and civilizational confidence that may signal the end of the post-Cold War global order.   Is this the beginning of a Second Cold War?   Is the West reorganizing around bloc competition?   Or are we witnessing the construction of a new world order? 

What Iran, Russia & China just did is HUGE, War BACKFIRES on Trump

Danny Haiphong   Iran's shocking response to Trump's imminent attack is sending fear down the spines of the US military as war leaves them defenseless from Iranian missile fire says Mohammad Marandi. This video breaks down why this war is already backfiring on Trump. 

Saudi Arabia & Qatar caught Mossad agents planning false flag operations inside their soil to blame Iran

Tucker Carlson says Saudi Arabia & Qatar caught & arrested Israeli Mossad agents planning bombings in those countries. pic.twitter.com/6PUxWeUymu — Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸 (@jacksonhinklle) March 3, 2026

US-Israeli attack on Iran expands into GLOBAL WAR: EU & UK join, Canada supports, Gulf regimes hit

Geopolitical Economy Report   The US-Israeli war on Iran is expanding into a global conflict. The European Union supports it. The UK is letting Trump use British bases. Germany and France are involved. Canada backs it. Tehran has retaliated, in self-defense, hitting US military bases in Gulf countries. Ben Norton explains. 

This Is Why Iran Will DEFEAT The United States & Israel!

The Jimmy Dore Show    

A response to misinformation on Nicaragua: it was a coup, not a ‘massacre’

There is so much misinformation in mainstream corporate media about recent events in Nicaragua that it is a pity that Mary Ellsberg’s article for Pulse has added to it with a seemingly leftish critique. Ellsberg claims that recent articles, including from this website, often “ paint a picture of the crisis in Nicaragua that is dangerously misleading. ” Unfortunately, her own article does just that. It looks at the situation entirely from the perspective of those opposing Daniel Ortega’s government while whitewashing their malevolent behavior and downplaying the levels of US support they have relied on. Her piece is an incomplete depiction of what is happening on the ground, ignoring many salient facts that have come to light and which have been outdated by recent events. The following is a brief response to Ellsberg’s main points from someone who lives in Nicaragua and has observed the situation directly and intimately: https://grayzoneproject.com/2018/08/15/a-res...

Η θύελλα έρχεται, Grexit τώρα!

globinfo freexchange Η εκστρατεία δαιμονοποίησης της πιθανότητας επιστροφής σε εθνικό νόμισμα συνεχίζεται αμείωτη, ακόμα και επί κυβέρνησης Τσίπρα. Η κυβέρνηση ΣΥΡΙΖΑ-ΑΝΕΛ είναι σίγουρο ότι δεν έχει την πραγματική εξουσία στη χώρα και αυτό φάνηκε τόσο από το οικονομικό πραξικόπημα Ντράγκι το περασμένο καλοκαίρι, όσο και από το γεγονός ότι επιβάλλονται στην παρούσα κυβέρνηση άνθρωποι σε θέσεις-κλειδιά, όπως για παράδειγμα ο τωρινός διοικητής της Τράπεζας της Ελλάδος, Γιάννης Στουρνάρας. Η προπαγάνδα της εγχώριας τραπεζομιντιακής δικτατορίας που διατηρεί ακόμα την πραγματική εξουσία, ως παράρτημα της Ευρωπαϊκής Χρηματοπιστωτικής Δικτατορίας (ΕΧΔ), δαιμονοποιεί με κάθε μέσο και με κάθε ευκαιρία, μέσα από τα γνωστά σενάρια ολέθρου, την πιθανότητα επιστροφής σε εθνικό νόμισμα. Όπως έχει επανειλημμένα τονιστεί σε παλαιότερα άρθρα, ο μόνος τρόπος για να σταματήσει η καταστροφική πορεία της χώρας, η οποία επιβάλλεται συστηματικά από τους μηχανισμούς της ευρω-δικτατορίας κ...

Five reasons a war with Iran will mark the final fall of US empire

globinfo freexchange   1. The nature of war has changed dramatically since the Iraq war, due to technological developments. A ground invasion, especially against Iran, would be catastrophic for the US empire with unpredictable consequences, even if the regime-change mission successfully completed.  2. The Iran allies in the region are still active, despite their losses. This is connected with the first reason in a way because armed groups dispersed in the Middle-East and affiliated with Iran, can lead to an asymmetric, out-of-control conflict to the point where US forces may suddenly find themselves trapped in a wider deadly warzone with no exit. The new, relatively cheap technology of drones and small/middle range missiles, is easily accessible to these groups. The Ansar Allah group in Yemen, already demonstrated their ability to sabotage US military operations. 3. Iran is not Iraq. Not only due to its size and the fact that we live now in a very different period, but also be...

Israel Panicking Over Iran War Already?

Breaking Points