The
process already started
globinfo
freexchange
Another
attack at the heart of Europe, another opportunity for the
implementation of the new conditions. We are watching the radical
transformation of the security orientation in Europe and the West.
Years of wars and destruction in the Middle East caused by the
military-industrial-security-financial complex, managed to bring
"asymmetric wars" inside the US and the European soil.
From
PressTV:
“France’s
defense minister has announced that more than 10,000 troops will
be stationed across the country to ensure security after the
recent terrorist attacks in the country’s capital city of Paris.
[...] France’s such use of army to establish security in the
country is unparalleled in recent history. France Prime Minister
Manuel Valls estimated earlier on Monday that the number of
military troops will be around 8,500.”
(http://www.presstv.com/Detail/2015/01/12/392771/France-ups-security-with-10000-troops)
From
BBC:
“Home
Secretary Theresa May, speaking after chairing a meeting of UK
government emergency committee Cobra, said security had been
increased at the France/UK border - notably at the Eurostar rail
terminal in Paris and the Channel Tunnel entrance at Calais. UK
border staff had 'intensified checks on passengers, on vehicles
and goods coming from France', she said. The move was a
'precautionary' measure and was not as a result of any specific
intelligence, she added. Armed patrols have also been increased at
St Pancras International station, the Eurostar terminal in London,
British Transport Police said. The UK terror threat level remains
unchanged at 'severe', meaning a terrorist attack is 'highly
likely'.” (http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-30721238)
|
It would be
probably interesting to focus on the statements of the French PM,
Manuel Valls, that "If 17 people die, this means mistakes
have been made," and "There was a failing, of
course… That's why we have to analyze what happened,"
(http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2015/01/10/392395/French-intelligence-has-failed-PM-says).
Interpreting
his words, Valls is actually targeting the security sector,
presenting the state as an insufficient mechanism to run it. The
economic crisis that hit eurozone struggling to recover after all
these years, is actually a very convenient situation towards the
propaganda on the "necessity" of privatization of the
security forces. The second target, is the promotion of further
justification of increased interceptions in the name of "national
security". Indeed, David Cameron already made statements on this
matter:
From
Guardian:
“Britain’s
spying agencies need more powers to read the contents of
communications in the wake of the Paris terror attacks, David
Cameron has said. The prime minister’s comments suggest a
Conservative government would bring in new intercept legislation
in 2016 to make sure there is no form of communication that cannot
be requested with a warrant signed by the home secretary. [...]
Speaking in Nottingham, he said the intelligence agencies need
more access to both communications data - records of phonecalls
and online exchanges between individuals - and the contents of
communications. This is compatible with a 'modern, liberal
democracy', he said.”
(http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jan/12/uk-spy-agencies-need-more-powers-says-cameron-paris-attacks?commentpage=1)
|
Only a few
months ago, the new situation has been described by the article
Globalized wars: Anyone can fight against anyone. A key paragraph from the article that "ISIS
fighters' threats concerning potential attacks in Western countries
serve perfectly the plan, which is to transfer the wars from borders
to urban centers. Indeed, since a citizen of any Western country,
attached to the ISIS or other extremist groups, is determined to die
in a bloodbath at the heart of this country, the protection of
borders has no meaning, and citizens start to wonder about the
ability of the nation-state to protect them.", shows that
the new conditions are promoted indeed very fast.
Why now? It
we go further, we should include the scenario of the preparation for
the desirable conditions on the prospect of a European Leftist rise.
Far-right perception, which is that we have to deal actually with a
war between the Christian and the Muslim world, is often adopted by
the mainstream media indirectly, embodied inside the narratives of
terror and fear. The establishment is trying to build a scenery of
constant terror and shape a pre-determined situation, so that it
would be very difficult to change, even in the case that the Left
will manage to rise to power in many European countries.
Actually, we
have to deal with a gigantic provocative operation. It shouldn't
surprise us because we live in a globalized, increasingly
interconnected world. History shows that the far-Right was used by
the big capital to impose its interests, especially in difficult
times. Now, it could be proved very useful for this "transportation"
of the conflict theaters from borders to urban centers, with the help
of the narrative about the supposed "clash of civilizations".
Former
Italian President Francesco Cossiga described it once: “Maroni
should do what I did when I was Minister of the Interior. University
students? Let them do what they want. Withdraw the police from
streets and universities, infiltrate the movement with provoking
agents ready for anything ["agenti provocatori" is the
Italian term] and let them devastate shops, put fire to the cars and
put cities to the sword for ten days. Then, strengthen by people’s
support, the sound of the sirens from ambulances will have to
overwhelm that from the police and carabinieri [italian military
police]. Law enforcement officers should pitilessly beat the shit out
of protesters and send them all to the hospital. They should not
arrest them since the courts would free them immediately, but they
should beat them savagely, and they should beat savagely as well
those teachers that incites them: not old professors, just the young
school teachers.”
(http://www.prisonplanet.com/ex-italian-president-provocateur-riots-then-beat-the-shit-out-of-protesters.html)
The
hypocritical leaders who were posing in the front line of the Charlie
Hebdo march, didn't bother to refer on the everyday suicide attacks
in Iraq who kill dozens of innocent people almost in every day basis,
probably because this is a routine situation there, or, maybe because
of their huge responsibilities about this situation. But the
"Iraqization" of Europe would be a very convenient pretext
for the extreme militarization of the big urban centers, under the
tolerance of the people, simulating an authoritarian regime. This is
actually the process for the enforcement of Feudal globalization,
using terror as a key tool.
Read
also:
"Training" societies in tolerating interceptions
|
Some politicians like Bill
Clinton and George W. Bush adopted this perception later and tried
to establish Western-type democracies based on this concept of
Negative Liberty, maintaining also the "fundamentalism"
of the big, mostly American, corporations and banks. They applied
a massive violence in other countries (Iraq, Yugoslavia, Somalia,
etc.), bringing another bloodbath through a different way. At the
same time, they imposed progressively, new measures of repression
and restrictions of civil liberties in Western democracies in the
name of protection against terrorism, thus verifying Berlin's
warning. Governments used propaganda and tactics based on human
psychology and therefore, the belief that interceptions and
repression measures are inevitable was inserted inside the Western
neo-rationalism, as an excuse to secure Western societies from
terrorist attacks. [...] The concept of Liberty itself tends to
disappear permanently inside increasingly militarized societies of
private armies.
|
Comments
Post a Comment