Skip to main content

How the German media mislead the public about the Greek crisis

by Joe Emersberger

Thanks to the mass media, European elites badly misinform their own people and get away with a quasi-coup in Greece. A July 10 Yougov poll found very solid public support in Germany for the Merkel government’s leading role in the destruction of the Greek economy.

Only 9 percent of Germans blame the Troika - the European Union, European Central Bank (ECB) and International Monetary Fund - for the state of the Greek economy. The level of ignorance is even worse in Sweden and Denmark. Only 6 percent and 4 percent in those countries, respectively, blame the Troika for the crisis in Greece.

In Germany, 59 percent exclusively blame past and present Greek governments for the crisis. In Sweden and Denmark, 65 percent and 70 percent, respectively, exclusively blame Greek governments. These numbers are a grim reminder of how effectively the media undermines democracy.

Consider how Der Spiegel, a German media outlet, summed things up for its readers: “From the perspective of most European Union leaders … Greece is little more than a failed state governed by clientelism and nepotism, a country whose economy has little to offer aside from olive oil and beach bars … That was true already five years ago when the government in Athens admitted to having taken on three times as much debt as previously disclosed, an admission that triggered the start of the euro crisis.”

Putting aside the condescension and near bigotry in the passage above, the “euro crisis” was actually triggered by a global recession that struck in 2009. It devastated countries like Spain which, unlike Greece, had been running budget surpluses and whose governments had not lied about their finances. Moreover, absolving Greece’s creditors by saying they were successfully bamboozled until 2010 is outrageous. Lenders are supposed to identify fraud and bad investment risks. It’s the socially useful function they supposedly perform.

It gets worse for the story Der Spiegel sells its readers. Dangerous trade imbalances within the eurozone - especially in Greece, Ireland and Spain - had been building for several years before the global recession. Dean Baker points out that the ECB was too incompetent to take action. Baker remarks, “Since it is apparently possible to take away the pensions that Greek people spent their life working for, some people may want to know if it’s possible to take back the much higher pensions earned by top officials at the ECB.” ECB officials need not worry provided they remain shielded by Der Spiegel and countless similar European outlets. Greek pensioners, on the other hand, have plenty to endure and worry about. Absolving creditors for what happened in Greece up to 2010 is ridiculous, but ignoring their overwhelming culpability for what has happened since then is on a whole other level of absurdity.

According to Der Spiegel, “Much had improved before Tsipras took over the government, to the point that national revenues had finally exceeded spending. But the Tsipras government loosened up the austerity regime, unsettled the business sector and consumers with contradictory announcements, and refused to privatize state-run enterprises.” The cynicism of this passage would have impressed Goebbels. It is best exposed by a single chart that Paul Krugman pointed out. You can literally draw a straight line between the amount of austerity (budget slashing) the Greek government has imposed over the past five years (as commanded by the Troika) and its brutal economic collapse. Greece’s public debt and the cost of public pensions both increased dramatically relative to GDP as the economy shrunk. A slow recovery had just begun when Tsipras took office, but that recovery was supposed to happen years earlier according to the Troika. Quite simply, the Troika’s orders were very closely followed and it led to a disaster comparable to the Great Depression. The polls I cited above show what a fine job the media in Europe has done to hide this simple truth from its audience, but there is more.

The long overdue recovery in Greece was undone by the malevolence of the ECB, and not, as Der Spiegel claimed, by Tsipras who has only been in power several months and, it should not even need saying, could never operate with very much autonomy from his European overlords. As Mark Weisbrot explained, “Just 10 days after the election, the ECB cut off its main line of credit to Greek banks, even though there was no obvious reason to do so. Shortly thereafter, the ECB put a limit on how much Greek banks could lend to the government – a limit that the previous government did not have.”

When the Tsipras government called a July 5 referendum on the Troika’s June 28 “offer” to Greece, the ECB ramped up its aggression and effectively forced the closure of Greek banks. Unlike people in Germany and Sweden, Greeks are living the gruesome consequences of the Troika’s policies and could not be propagandized or intimidated into voting the way the Troika openly demanded.

The Economist argued, “No one has suggested having a referendum in other countries about bailing out the Greeks, for the very good reason that they know what the answer will be.”

In other words, Europeans who have been completely misled about the Greek crisis, and who are shielded from its consequences, are willing endorse their governments’ cruelty toward Greeks. German officials have openly boasted about how well protected its economy is against collapse in Greece – not an empty boast given the reality of the past several years. People who believe in democracy assume that it gives voters the most influence on decisions that impact them the most. That is why nobody would endorse the citizens of Athens electing the mayor of Berlin and contemptuously disregarding what Berliners think. Anyone who claims that Germany and its allies are acting with democratic legitimacy in Greece are endorsing that kind of nonsense.

In the same article, the Economist also argued that German banks have not been bailed out by the Troika: “if only the banks were the creditors, the whole issue might be easier to deal with. Go back to the 2012 deal; the private sector creditors (the banks) were made to take a 50% write-off…”

As Jerome Roos pointed out, the bailouts began in 2010, not 2012 as the Economist pretends, and even IMF economists stated that the 2010 bailouts “only served to delay debt restructuring and allowed many private creditors to escape … leaving taxpayers and the official sector on the hook”.

Decent people in Germany and elsewhere in Europe who want to hold the Troika accountable and alleviate suffering in Greece should not underestimate the uphill battle they face against the media at home.

Source:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Capitalism & Genocide - Yanis Varoufakis Speech at the Gaza Tribunal, 23rd October 2025, Istanbul

Yanis Varoufakis   On 23rd October, Yanis Varoufakis testified in front of the Jury of Conscience in the context of the Gaza Tribunal. His speech focused on the economic forces underpinning the genocide of the Palestinian people. In particular, he spoke on the manner in which capitalist dynamics have historically fuelled the white settler colonial project and, more recently, how the accumulation of a new form of capital - which he calls cloud capital - has accelerated, deepened and amplified the economic forces powering and propelling the machinery of genocide. 

Exposed: USA plans to use this country to hurt China & help Israel

Geopolitical Economy Report   In Cold War Two, the USA is pressuring countries to cut ties with China and recognize Taiwan separatists. Donald Trump blatantly meddled in Honduras' 2025 election and backed a political coup to put in power right-wing oligarch Nasry "Tito" Asfura, who strongly supports Taiwan and Israel. Ben Norton discusses US imperialism in Latin America.  

Iranian Seyed M. Marandi: What REALLY happened in Iran & why U.S. wants to destroy the country

Li Jingjing 李菁菁   Track records of Western interventions tell us we need to be skeptical and cautious whenever some Western politicians and pundits claim they want to liberate people in another country and bring them democracy. Seyed Mohammad Marandi is a professor at the University of Tehran in Iran. In this episode, he told Li Jingjing what happened during the protests in Iran and how Western sanctions hurt the lives of ordinary Iranians.

Israel & CIA Behind Iran Protests To Get U.S. To Attack!

The Jimmy Dore Show    As protests in Iran have heated up, western media has actively exaggerated and selectively framed the violence by using casualty figures from U.S.- and Israel-funded NGOs — all in order to build public support for another regime-change war. Former CIA officer John Kiriakou and guest Scott Ritter claim protests were infiltrated by foreign intelligence networks and that Israel and the U.S. are using “human rights” narratives similarly to the way they were used in Iraq and Syria.   Dore and Ritter contend that Iran’s government responded to armed unrest rather than peaceful protest, while mainstream outlets ignore attacks on police and public infrastructure. They warn that propaganda, sanctions, and media coordination are laying the groundwork for a wider U.S.–Israel conflict with Iran. 

Iran’s Missiles will DESTROY US Bases & Israel if Trump Attacks

Danny Haiphong   Iran is ready for war, and its hypersonic ballistic missile system could destroy Israel & US military presence forever says Scott Ritter who joined the show to break down the consequences of Trump's march to war with Iran. The former UN Weapons Inspector does a deep dive into Iran's readiness and why it should terrify Trump & Israel together. 

US & Israel support protests in Iran: Trump calls for regime change

Geopolitical Economy Report   The US government is openly backing the protests in Iran. An Israeli media outlet admitted foreign powers are arming Iranian rioters with weapons to try to overthrow the government. Ben Norton explains the geopolitical context and why the USA has sought regime change ever since the 1979 Iranian Revolution.   

Ο βασικός λόγος που ο Τραμπ διστάζει να χτυπήσει το Ιράν

"Μικρά και ασήμαντα" από τον Πίκο Απίκο Ο βασικός λόγος που δεν έγινε η επίθεση στο Ιράν, είναι το γεγονός ότι πρόσφατα, το Ιράν αποχώρησε από το δορυφορικό σύστημα GPS που είναι Αμερικανικό και εντάχθηκε στο Κινεζικό BeiDou. Που σημαίνει ότι οι Αμερικανοί δεν έχουν τη δυνατότητα να σαμποτάρουν τους Ιρανικούς πυραύλους.  Έτσι εξηγείται και το μεγάλο ποσοστό ευστοχίας των Ιρανικών πυραύλων στην τελευταία σύγκρουση με το Ισραήλ, μέσα στο Ισραηλινό έδαφος. Αλλά και το γεγονός ότι πριν λίγες μέρες, οι ίδιοι οι Ισραηλινοί ζήτησαν τη διαμεσολάβηση της Ρωσίας, προκειμένου να αποκλιμακωθεί η ένταση με το Ιράν, αφού Ισραηλινές εφημερίδες και αξιωματούχοι είχαν παραδεχθεί ανοιχτά την παρουσία πρακτόρων της Μοσάντ σε Ιρανικό έδαφος και τον κομβικό τους ρόλο στις πρόσφατες εξεγέρσεις. Οι Αμερικανοί επομένως γνωρίζουν ότι αυτή τη στιγμή οι Ιρανοί έχουν τη δυνατότητα να χτυπήσουν Αμερικανικές βάσεις (όπως απείλησαν ότι θα κάνουν αν ο Τραμπ κάνει πράξη τις απειλές του), χωρίς να μπορούν να ...

A response to misinformation on Nicaragua: it was a coup, not a ‘massacre’

There is so much misinformation in mainstream corporate media about recent events in Nicaragua that it is a pity that Mary Ellsberg’s article for Pulse has added to it with a seemingly leftish critique. Ellsberg claims that recent articles, including from this website, often “ paint a picture of the crisis in Nicaragua that is dangerously misleading. ” Unfortunately, her own article does just that. It looks at the situation entirely from the perspective of those opposing Daniel Ortega’s government while whitewashing their malevolent behavior and downplaying the levels of US support they have relied on. Her piece is an incomplete depiction of what is happening on the ground, ignoring many salient facts that have come to light and which have been outdated by recent events. The following is a brief response to Ellsberg’s main points from someone who lives in Nicaragua and has observed the situation directly and intimately: https://grayzoneproject.com/2018/08/15/a-res...

Jeffrey Sachs: The US is a violent regime

CGTN   Shortly after US President Donald Trump announced on social media that American forces had carried out military actions against Venezuela, President Nicolas Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores were forcibly taken to New York City to face US charges including narco-trafficking. Speaking with CGTN's Tian Wei, Columbia University professor Jeffrey Sachs warned that such actions reflect a broader pattern of militarized US foreign policy. By sidelining international law and disregarding the UN Charter, Washington is undermining the very framework meant to safeguard global peace and prevent another era of devastating wars. 

The real reason Trump hesitates to strike Iran

globinfo freexchange   Recent statements by the Iranian leadership concerning the ability of Iran to hit US military bases, should not be taken lightly. It is not just the missile capability and - in some cases - even superiority of Iran in the broader region. That alone, would not be enough for Washington to take Tehran's threats seriously.    It has to do also with a strategic move by Iran in the geopolitical battlefield that changes the balance decisively in the war field too. As Pakistan Today reported back in July 2025:   In two recent wars that nearly tipped the world into a full-scale global conflict— one between Pakistan and India, and the other between Iran and Israel— a new determinant of military dominance emerged. In both cases, countries under pressure, Pakistan and Iran, not only stood their ground but struck deep into enemy territory with astonishing precision and devastating impact.  ... in a 12-day war with Israel, Iran destroyed numerous h...