Skip to main content

Despite Bannon’s role in campaign, Bolsonaro is not Brazil’s Trump – he’s far worse

Bolsonaro is different from Trump in that – instead of planning to build a wall or enact an immigration ban – Bolsonaro believes in using military and police violence to purge Brazil of “undesirables.”

by Whitney Webb

The rise to prominence of Brazil’s far-right presidential candidate Jair Bolsonaro has given many in Brazil and abroad cause for concern. Bolsonaro – once considered a “fringe” politician – has publicly proposed bringing back elements of the country’s former military dictatorship, which he has often promoted over his three-decades-long career in Brazil’s Congress.

Despite the real concern that Bolsonaro’s potential victory in the upcoming Brazilian election could resurrect some of the country’s darkest days, international media outlets – particularly in the West – have widely likened Bolsonaro to U.S. President Donald Trump. Indeed, in recent years, Bolsonaro has promoted Trumpesque policies such as “draining the swamp,” crusading against corruption, and an end to the moderate welfare policies put in place by the center-left Workers’ Party (PT) under the tenures of former Brazilian presidents Dilma Rousseff and Luís Inácio Lula da Silva.

The comparisons between Trump and Bolsonaro have only grown after it was recently announced that Steve Bannon, the former head of Breitbart News and former chief advisor to Trump, will serve as an advisor to Bolsonaro’s presidential campaign. Bannon’s inclusion in Bolsonaro’s campaign was announced by his son, Eduardo Bolsonaro, who also confirmed that Bannon “had made himself available to help.” Eduardo Bolsonaro, who is also a congressman, further elaborated that Bannon’s involvement will involve “giving internet tips, analysis, interpreting data,” and similar types of assistance.

Bannon has long followed Bolsonaro’s political career but reportedly became enthusiastic about his prospects for Brazil’s presidency after seeing the candidate being swarmed by a crowd of supporters after arriving at a Brazilian airport.

Despite Bannon’s involvement in Bolsonaro’s campaign, observers of the upcoming Brazilian election should not be so quick to compare Bolsonaro to Donald Trump. Indeed, whereas Trump was a political newcomer, Bolsonaro has served over 30 years in the “swamp” he claims he wants to drain as a congressman. He also recently – in the last four years – became interested in fighting corruption, only after it embroiled the country’s prominent center-left Workers’ Party, long the object of Bolsonaro’s political ire.

For much of his political career, Bolsonaro was considered fringe – even for Brazil’s right – given his long-standing promotion of Brazil’s dictatorship, which controlled the country from 1964 to 1985. Indeed, Bolsonaro has called the 1964 coup a “defense of democracy.” In an infamous interview in 1999, Bolsonaro declared that the country’s military dictatorship had failed to “finish its job,” adding that “you are not going to change anything through voting; … you’ll only change things by having a civil war and doing the work the military regime didn’t do.

According to Bolsonaro, the work the military dictatorship “didn’t do” is the “killing [of] 30,000, starting with FHC [former Brazilian President Fernando Henrique Cardoso].” “If a few innocent people die, that’s alright,” Bolsonaro concluded.

Trumpism on steroids

Though — like Trump — Bolsonaro has long vowed to defend Brazil against “internal enemies” such as “communists,” “Indians,” and “faggots,” Bolsonaro is different from Trump in that – instead of planning to build a wall or enact an immigration ban – Bolsonaro believes in using military and police violence to purge Brazil of “undesirables.

Even after reinventing himself as an anti-corruption crusader, Bolsonaro’s promotion of Brazil’s past dictatorship and its violent tactics has shone through with stunning regularity. For instance, while voting to impeach Dilma Rousseff in 2016, Bolsonaro announced his vote in favor of impeachment by stating: “They lost in ‘64, they lost now in 2016 … against Communism, for our freedom … in memory of Colonel Carlos Alberto Brilhante Ustra, the terror of Dilma Rousseff … for our Armed Forces, I vote yea.

Carlos Ustra was a colonel in the Brazilian Army and the head of the DOI-CODI, a well-known torture center that, during Ustra’s tenure, tortured more than 300 people, including pregnant women and children as young as five.

As Frederico Freitas recently wrote in Current Affairs, Brazil’s seemingly surprising embrace of a far-right would-be mass murderer is the sad result of Brazil’s long failure to grapple with the dark past of the dictatorship. Freitas argues: “Brazil has never fully reckoned with the political crimes of its military dictatorship. This void of justice and consequence has allowed the right wing to return and thrive. This is the regime in which a man like Bolsonaro can build a fatalist political campaign that presents a return to the ‘years of lead’ as the only solution for the current Brazilian crisis.

Though Bolsonaro’s appeals to “drain the swamp,” his shallow nationalism targeting “internal enemies,” and his new link to Steve Bannon evoke comparisons between him and Trump, such comparisons are misleading. They glibly write off a future Bolsonaro-led Brazil as being like a Trump-led United States, when the Brazilian edition is set to be much worse.

Source, links:



Related:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Operation Mindfuck: The origins of the Illuminati conspiracy fraud and how it became popular in our times

From the new documentary Can 't Get You Out of My Head by Adam Curtis   globinfo freexchange   The first settlers had come from Europe to America to flee from the corruption of power in the Old World. But although they had got away from the old power, they hadn't got away from their suspicious minds, and alone, out in the vast wilderness of the new America, that led them to imagining dark, hidden conspiracies in their own government, far away in Washington.    One of the first of these, in the early 19th century, said that a secret group from Europe, called the Bavarian Illuminati, were running a giant conspiracy in America to destroy the new democracy. In reality, the Illuminati had been a utopian movement who wanted to replace religion with reason. But instead, they now became the first of a series of frightening suspicions that fed off the isolation of the settlers in the New World.    One night (in 1958, somewhere in the vicinity of Whittier, Califo...

US Warships Under Fire: Iran Hits Back & Blasts UAE

MintPress News  "PROJECT FREEDOM." Trump calls it humanitarian aid. We call it what he already admitted it is: piracy. On Friday, Trump boasted that US forces seizing Iranian ships and oil were "sort of like pirates, but we are not playing games."  By Sunday, he had rebranded the blockade as "Project Freedom"—a military escort operation to guide ships through the Strait of Hormuz. Today, that operation went live: 15,000 US troops, guided-missile destroyers, and over 100 aircraft are enforcing American "freedom" at gunpoint. Let's be clear: Washington didn't enter the Strait to defend commerce. It entered to monopolize commerce—to maintain imperial control over the world's oil arteries and strangle Iran's economy.  Iran knows this. That's why closing the Strait and establishing its own transit protocols remains its strongest card in the fight for self-determination. When Trump confessed to piracy, he wasn't joking. He was c...

Russia & China Now OPENLY Backing Iran!

The Jimmy Dore Show    

“Russia & China Preparing For War With The US!”

The Jimmy Dore Show   Colonel Douglas Macgregor explains that as a result of recent military conflicts, Russia, China, and Iran have become allies, and that Beijing and Moscow have concluded that "if we let Iran fail, we're next on the menu" from what he describes as a "rogue state led by a rogue personality," meaning they will intervene to prevent Iran's collapse if the US threatens it. He tells Jimmy Dore that Putin called Trump for an hour and a half to make it clear that a military campaign in Iran would not succeed and would make the situation much worse, offering to store Iran's enriched uranium as a diplomatic gesture. Macgregor warns that if the US restarts the war, China could send 40 or 50 surface combatants and submarines to the Indian Ocean, and Russia could fly MiG-31s into Iranian airspace — not to provoke a direct confrontation but to "make a point." He concludes that the British Empire overreached and overextended with World War...

How 'Liberal' Media Sold You Mass Murder & Genocide

Secular Talk    

Iranian Women Resist Invasion, Hospitals Targeted & Petrodollar Collapse

MintPress News   MintPress News founder Mnar Adley, this essential interview with University of Tehran professor Dr. Setareh Sadeghi reveals the devastating reality of US-Israeli aggression against Iran that corporate media refuses to report. With over 307 medical facilities destroyed in one month, schools bombed, and universities targeted, Iran faces what officials describe as a genocidal campaign. Dr. Sadeghi exposes: • How BBC journalists calling for Iran to be "nuked" are tied to CIA-backed regime change networks • Why Iranian women are leading mass rallies in defense of their nation—not against it • The collapse of Western propaganda as independent Iranian creators go viral worldwide • How Iran's regulation of the Strait of Hormuz is accelerating the petrodollar's decline • UAE's covert complicity in war crimes while positioning itself as a neutral party • Why Russia and China are aligning with Iran against unipolar imperial domination As Trump threatens to ...

How Western societies lost their faith in Vision

Why people don't rise up massively today? Why there are no real revolutions? How we tolerate all things that have been imposed to us? These questions come up in people's minds more and more often today in Greece and abroad, due to the economic crisis. Some theories are circulated as an answer, among these, explanations which include, for example, the psychosynthesis of modern Greeks, but the truth is that there is something more fundamental behind this passive behaviour and concerns not only Greece, but the entire Western world. by system failure Prior to the beginning of the 20th century, Friedrich Nietzsche declares God's death and Western world will put all its hopes in science. Laplace's Determinism leads to the almighty man, who through science, can find all the answers for the world. Technology, which naturally comes from scientific discoveries, promises prosperity and a better life for the majority. Science becomes the central "pylon...

Stephen Hawking confirms: The problem is Capitalism, not robots!

globinfo freexchange According to world famous physicist Stephen Hawking, the rising use of automated machines may mean the end of human rights – not just jobs. But he’s not talking about robots with artificial intelligence taking over the world, he’s talking about the current capitalist political system and its major players. On Reddit, Hawking said that the economic gap between the rich and the poor will continue to grow as more jobs are automated by machines, and the owners of said machines hoard them to create more wealth for themselves. The insatiable thirst for capitalist accumulation bestowed upon humans by years of lies and terrible economic policy has affected technology in such a way that one of its major goals has become to replace human jobs. If we do not take this warning seriously, we may face unfathomable corporate domination. If we let the same people who buy and sell our political system and resources maintain control of automated technology, the...

Trump Talks COLLAPSE SPECTACULARLY As Iran REFUSES DEMANDS & HUMILIATES HIM Again & Again!!

Secular Talk    

Why the US pressured the UAE to leave OPEC: Big Oil corporations benefit

Geopolitical Economy Report   OPEC, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, is in crisis after the United Arab Emirates (UAE), its third-largest producer, left the group. Donald Trump openly praised the decision, saying it is good for the United States. Ben Norton explains why the US government opposes OPEC, which is rooted in the Third World nationalist movements of the 1960s, which sought more economic resources for the Global South. The USA wants its Big Oil corporations to dominate the industry.