The Western
neo-colonialists will do whatever it takes to topple Assad regime,
even if they would have to destroy completely Syria. Syria is paying
the price of its strategic position, not only because the Western
vultures want to take full control of the energy corridors, from the
Arabian Peninsula all the way to Europe, but also because they want
to uproot the last Russian access to the East Mediterranean.
The Western
protagonists of the Syrian destruction are the same who destroyed
Libya.
From RT
:
| 
    
For nearly six years, Washington and
   its allies have gotten away with playing a cynical double game in
   Syria’s war. But now the mask is slipping to reveal the ugly
   face of Western involvement – it is openly siding with
   terrorists. 
    
Russia was correct to veto a
   French-sponsored draft resolution at the UN Security Council this
   weekend. Along with American and British vigorous support, the
   French proposal centered on halting military flights over the
   besieged northern Syrian city of Aleppo. 
As Russia’s foreign ministry
   commented, the French initiative was tantamount to giving air
   cover for insurgents dominated by the internationally proscribed
   terrorist group Jabhat al Nusra. In short, a no-fly zone
   protecting terrorists would have been imposed in violation of
   Syrian sovereign rights, as well as international law. 
An alternative draft resolution put
   forward by Russia was subsequently nixed by the US, Britain and
   France. The Russian proposal was aimed at reviving the ceasefire
   arrangement declared last month by US Secretary of State John
   Kerry and Moscow’s Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. It reiterated
   the need for anti-government militants to dissociate from the
   proscribed terrorist groups affiliated with al Qaeda, including al
   Nusra and Daesh (ISIS). Russia is calling for a general ceasefire,
   but it does not specify the condition of halting military flights
   over Aleppo. 
If France and its Western allies
   were genuine about wanting to stop the violence, then why don’t
   they get behind the Kerry-Lavrov deal? They have evidently
   abandoned that ceasefire arrangement because it was exposing
   Western claims about supporting “moderate rebels” as distinct
   from “extremists” as a fallacy. 
That the Kerry-Lavrov truce was
   immediately violated by the insurgents and that there was no
   separation of “moderates” and “extremists” showed once and
   for all that Western claims of supporting “legitimate rebels”
   are a farce. Washington, London and Paris are patently backing a
   terrorist army fighting for their objective of regime change in
   Syria. 
[...] 
Given the high stakes, this is why
   Western powers are evidently becoming more desperate to impede
   Syrian and Russian military success against the insurgents.
   Western emotive denunciations against Syria and Russia have
   nothing to do with concern for human suffering. It is all about
   contriving a moralistic political pressure to hamper the campaign
   against the West’s terrorist project. 
[...] 
The US-led air strikes also give
   full meaning to the deadly American attack on the Syrian army base
   at Deir ez-Zor on September 17. Over 60 Syrian troops and nearly
   200 more were wounded when US, British and Australian warplanes
   blasted the base in a sustained attack. Washington claimed it was
   an “accident”. But to many other observers, the massacre was
   no accident. It was a deliberate assault by the Western coalition
   to end the Kerry-Lavrov pact because the failing ceasefire was
   exposing the systematic terror connections of the Western
   governments in Syria. 
Washington and its allies are not
   just trying to give air cover to the terrorists in Syria
   indirectly by setting up so-called no-fly zones. They are
   evidently now giving the terrorists air fire-power. 
As in the NATO regime-change war in
   Libya in 2011, the Americans, French and British are riding
   shotgun in the air for terrorists on the ground. And the truly
   disgusting thing about this criminal collusion is that the Western
   powers claim to be concerned about international law, war crimes
   and human suffering. 
 | 
 
Indeed,
various emails from Hillary Clinton archive, published by WikiLeaks,
revealed the timeline of the race of the Western neo-colonialists, to
secure a privileged position for their big companies over the Libyan
corpse.
As described
previously, Libya's National Transitional Council (NTC), Mustafa
Abdul Jalil, was prepared to favor firms from France, the United
Kingdom, and the United States in specific cases, based on the
support they provided for the NTC during the rebellion.
Because of
the Russian strong presence in Syria, the Western neo-colonialists
are determined to play their dirty games united, until the topple of
Assad. Then, they will probably start another race over the Syrian
corpse to secure a better position for their companies.
Comments
Post a Comment