the unbalanced evolution of homo sapiens

globinfo freexchange Peruvian journalist Jaime Bayly claimed in his TV show Bayly , that he was aware and had personally approved the attempted assassination of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro. " My reliable sources have called me and told me 'on Saturday we will assassinate Maduro' and I told them 'do it', " he said in his show and added: " When they asked me if I would condemn their move I replied that if they want I can buy them another drone. " Referring to Maduro, the journalist called him to be on alert. " My friends, " he said, " are very capable, they have already scared you and there are more to come ". In a press conference, Maduro wondered how it is possible a host of a show in the US stating openly that he was aware of the attempted assassination. Info from: https://info-war.gr/gnoriza-kai-enekrina-ti-dolofonia-madoyro-ischyrizetai-paroysiastis-sto-maiami/ Meanwhi

The US Senate Intelligence Committee has requested that persecuted WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange testify before committee staff. The committee is investigating alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election. Is this a trap to get Assange out of the Ecuadorian embassy?  

globinfo freexchange Alex Jones' wet dream has just become reality thanks to the combined move by Facebook, Apple, YouTube and Spotify to ban Infowars. These private IT and social media companies couldn't give a better gift to him right now. At a time where Infowars was going through a saturated period according to the best scenario, the corporate giants actually saved it with that stupid(?) strategy. Suddenly, a corporate branch of the liberal establishment gave real value to Alex Jones' awful performance, pretending to be the 'anti-establishment' hero - just like Donald Trump - and made him a real hero in the eyes of the ultra-conservative audience that has been brainwashed by his absurd conspiracy theories. If you are not convinced yet that the liberal establishment and the far-right are actually working hand in hand in a well-directed scenario, consider this: right after Infowars' banning, all the big media immediately spread the news with

Barack Obama waded back into politics last week, publishing a list of 81 endorsements for the November midterm elections – a list which curiously did not feature New York’s rising star Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Ocasio-Cortez, who identifies as a Democratic Socialist, pulled off a stunning victory back in June when she defeated 10-term Democratic incumbent Joe Crowley in New York’s 14th congressional district primary after launching a massively successful grassroots campaign. Various theories have been put forward as to why Obama “snubbed” the 28-year-old up-and-comer in his party. Some have noted that this is just the “first wave” of Obama endorsements, and that he quite possibly will endorse her later, while others say that he is not quite ready to attach his name to Ocasio-Cortez’s brand of Democratic Socialism, particularly given the unease it is causing among more traditional Democrats. There’s also the theory that he didn’t endorse her because, in her very left-lea

European companies doing business with Iran could soon find themselves between a rock and a hard place. Should they comply with US sanctions and abandon Tehran, they may in turn face sanctions in their home EU. If European companies cave in to US President Donald Trump's threat of secondary sanctions and stop doing business in Iran, they will be punished by the EU itself, says the aide to Federica Mogherini, the bloc's foreign policy chief. “ If EU companies abide by US secondary sanctions they will, in turn, be sanctioned by the EU, ” Nathalie Tocci told BBC Radio 4 in an interview on Monday night, as reported by NBC. According to Tocci, the move would show Iranians that the Europeans are serious about keeping the 2015 nuclear deal intact despite Washington's efforts to tear it down. Earlier, the EU enacted the Blocking statute to forbid its companies from complying with the US sanctions, which came back into force on Monday as part of Washington's

How a nearly unknown businessman named Khaled al Ahmad became Damascus’ secret liaison to the West and quietly dealt Syria’s grinding war to a close by Rania Khalek Part 2 - The man behind the deals In dozens of towns, villages, and cities across Syria, reconciliation agreements have brought fighting to a halt. Some people call them truces, others refer to them as settlements and those staunchly opposed to them call them forced surrenders. Whatever one’s preferred label, there’s no denying that the reconciliation process has been vital to the de-escalation of violence Syria has witnessed over the past two years. The reconciliation process was initiated in 2015, when al Ahmad carried a message to Berlin. There, he met with representatives of the Southern Front, a coalition of Western and Saudi-backed rebel groups that operate in Southern Syria and received support from the US-run Military Operations Center (MOC) in Jordan. That same message was delivered to faction lea

Did Nicaragua’s Sandinista government really kill 300+ peaceful protesters? A forensic analysis of the death toll exposes the claim as a dangerous lie. by Max Blumenthal Part 3 - How anti-Sandinista “human rights” NGOs and Washington cooked the books Hendrix found that the three main self-proclaimed human rights groups in Nicaragua had removed the contexts of the deaths they recorded in order to conflate every unnatural death that occurred across the country between April 19 and June 25 with killings by Nicaraguan pro-government forces. He found that seven categories of deaths were included in the human rights reports. All categories except for one were totally unrelated to government violence. They are as follows: Duplicated names Deaths unrelated to protests People murdered by the opposition Opposition activists, including those involved in the violent tranques Innocent bystanders Names without significant data to determine

It is no coincidence that some of the world’s most ardent imperialists are behind the cynical exploitation of one heinous murder — of British MP Jo Cox — to enable global mass-murder as well as human trafficking under the pretext of “ethical” and “humanitarian” intervention. by Vanessa Beeley and Whitney Webb Part 4 - Instant exploitation Within five days of Cox’s murder, the White Helmets PR agency, Syria Campaign, had produced another in a long line of slick marketing campaigns. This time they announced “8 Reasons why Syrians will never forget Jo Cox.” Those eight reasons tied in perfectly with the U.K./U.S. Coalition “regime change” agenda. They included calls for “real action” to protect the Syrian “people;” not seeing Syria as Iraq; the root cause of killing and extremism in Syria is…. Assad; breaking the ubiquitous sieges (those allegedly created by Assad, not by the extremist factions, naturally); welcoming refugees; lobbying the UN to support unlawful interventio

globinfo freexchange In the early nineties, an epidemic of mental disorder was sweeping America and Britain. It had been uncovered by a new system for identifying disorders. Psychiatry had been attacked for relying on the personal and fallible judgement of psychiatrists. But instead, a new objective method based on checklists had been invented. These listed only the objective symptoms, and deliberately did not enquire into why the individuals felt an anxiety. In the late 80s, nationwide surveys had revealed an incredible picture: more than 50% of Americans suffered from mental disorders. But at the very same, the drug companies had announced that they had created a new type of drug, called an SSRI, which they claimed, targeted the circuits inside the brain that were causing these malfunctions. The SSRIs were marketed under names like "Prozac". What they did was alter the amounts of serotonin that flowed across the circuit connections within the brain, and they

του Άρη Χατζηστεφάνου Πώς θα αντιδρούσαν οι ΗΠΑ αν κάποιος προσπαθούσε να δολοφονήσει τον πρόεδρο της χώρας με δυο drones με εκρηκτικά; Πιθανότατα θα εισέβαλλαν σε μια ή περισσότερες χώρες ακόμη και αν δεν είχαν καμία απόδειξη ότι αυτές εμπλέκονται στην υπόθεση – όπως ακριβώς έκαναν στο Αφγανιστάν και το Ιράκ. Σε ανάλογη περίπτωση, είναι σχεδόν βέβαιο ότι το Ισραήλ θα βομβάρδιζε τη Γάζα και το Λίβανο, όπως κάνει σε τακτά χρονικά διαστήματα ακόμη και αν δεν έχει κάποιο τόσο σοβαρό πρόσχημα. Η Αγγλία από την πλευρά της, θα έκοβε τις διπλωματικές σχέσεις και θα επέβαλλε κυρώσεις στη Ρωσία, ακόμη και αν δεν είχε να παρουσιάσει καμία απόδειξη για την ενοχή της. Σε όλες τις περιπτώσεις τα διεθνή μέσα ενημέρωσης θα έσπευδαν να στηρίξουν αυτές τις δολοφονικές επεμβάσεις και τις διπλωματικές κινήσεις στο όνομα της εθνικής ασφάλειας των χωρών που δέχθηκαν το χτύπημα. Όταν όμως η επίθεση στοχεύει τον πρόεδρο μιας χώρας όπως η Βενεζουέλα, η κατάσταση αλλάζει.