US Realpolitik 2.0: the recruitment of evil Kissingerism against Russia and China under Donald Trump
The man that
could easily be considered the personification of the ruthless US
deep state is back. Henry Kissinger comes at the right time in White
House to provide 'expertise' on how to provoke a major conflict,
especially now that the Sino-Russian bloc threatens the US world
domination.
As
Mintpressnews
reports:
While
most reporting gave some context to Trump’s most recent meeting
with top defense officials on tensions with Pyongyang, hardly any
mentioned that the meeting had been immediately preceded by another.
This meeting, also on the topic of North Korea, was held between the
president and former Secretary of State and unindicted war criminal
Henry Kissinger. [...] Given Trump’s bellicose rhetoric and threats
towards North Korea – as well as his rejection of diplomacy in
resolving the crisis despite both Pyongyang’s and his own State
Department’s apparent willingness to attempt it – Kissinger’s
timely guidance to the President during “the calm before the storm”
should give the American public considerable cause for concern.
Adam
Curtis in his film The
Trap: What Happened to our Dream of Freedom,
gives
a short background about Kissinger's Realpolitik:
Ever
since the Second World War, American governments had struggled to
contain the spread of Communism, and the wave of Third World
revolutions was the dangerous new face in this battle. To try and
stop it, during the 60's and 70's, American governments adopted a
ruthless strategy backing dictators and tyrants around the world who
offered to contain these revolutionary forces. They did this, by
repressing or killing thousands of their own people. The Main
architect of this policy was Henry Kissinger, secretary of State
under president Nixon. He used America's power to back dictators like
general Pinochet in Chile, and Ferdinand Marcos in the Philippines.
Kissinger knew that these dictators used torture and mass killing to
stay in power, but in his theory, what he called Realpolitik, this
was the price that had to be paid if Soviet tyranny was to be kept in
check.
Where
there's smoke there's fire, so when Kissinger comes, prepare for war.
Why 'dirty
Henry' needed to come back at this moment? Most probable answer, to
give useful advice and guide 'appropriately' Donald Trump.
So, the next
question that comes in mind: would he be coming back under Hillary
Clinton too? The seemingly surprisingly answer is 'No'! True, because
Hillary doesn't need any guidance. She comes straight from the
Kissingerian Realpolitik school, and therefore, she knows very well
what to do to provoke Russia and China. She would have been devoted
to that mission from her first day in the Oval Office.
There is
evidence that Trump was receiving advice from the warmongering
Kissinger quite long before his election. And that can be seen in the
strategic approach against the Sino-Russian rival bloc. Both Donald
Trump and Henry Kissinger appeared to be seeking a diplomatic
approach with Russia, contrary to China. Behind this, there is a
clear strategy to break the Sino-Russian alliance by concentrating
pressure on the component that threatens the economic domination of
the US, but has not yet the military strength to confront the US war
machine.
And here
comes North Korea. China is already encircled by the US naval forces
in Asia Pacific. The next step would be the presence of US troops on
the ground, right next to the Chinese borders in the Northeast. So,
North Korea as the final barrier must be removed.
Let's guess
what could be Kissinger's key advice to Donald Trump. Probably, to
increase pressure on North Korea to abandon its nuclear program. Iran
did it and now the clouds of war are gathering above it as the Donald
wants to cancel the nuclear deal, find a pretext to invade. The US
empire first imposes tough sanctions together with its faithful
allies, then disarms the target, then invades.
Yet, the
best part of the story may surprise you even further. Because the US
warmongering establishment may be feeling more comfortable with Trump
in power. Hillary Clinton would not be that easy to be 'manoeuvred'
on this matter due to her excessive zeal to confront Russia. But
Donald, despite his frequent shows where he presents himself as an
unpredictable 'prima donna', is taken by the hand by the 'Darth
Vader' of US foreign policy in order to make the right steps towards
the destruction of the Sino-Russian alliance.
Comments
Post a Comment