Skip to main content

Squid Game 2, an Allegory of Capitalism Versus Democracy

In the nail-biting new season of Netflix’s hit series Squid Game, players’ desperate circumstances push them to make fatally risky bets on individual success even when collective action might save them.
 
by Caitlyn Clark 

If the debut season of the Korean Netflix series Squid Game laid bare the ails of modern capitalism, its highly anticipated second season reflects the challenges to organizing against it.

Initially released in 2021, Squid Game became an overnight global phenomenon. In the dystopian survival show, financially desperate players enter into a series of challenges adapted from Korean children’s games in hopes of winning a hefty cash prize. The stakes are lethal: lose a game, and you’re eliminated — permanently. 

Any time one of the roughly four hundred players dies, the total prize money is raised by 100,000,000 Korean won (approximately US$70,000). After each round, players are given the option to take a popular vote on whether or not to continue the games. If players vote to end the game before all six rounds are completed, the prize money will be divided evenly among the remaining players.

In season one, the players successfully vote to discontinue the game after just the first round. However, upon returning to the reality of debt and financial despair of their everyday lives, they decide to come back to the games. Rather than scrounging for pennies in the real world, players stake their lives for the chance to free themselves from poverty and debt. It’s the crushing exploitation and unfairness of the capitalist system that brings the players back to the game.

Squid Game 2 makes even greater use of voting, dramatizing the role of elections in upholding capitalism. 
 
(If you want to avoid spoilers, stop reading now.) 
 
In the second season, protagonist Seong Gi-hun returns after winning the first season’s games and the 38 billion won (approximately US$26 million) prize money. His aim is not more wealth; he wants to find the ring of sadistic ultrarich elites running the games and end them for good. After an insurgent paramilitary strategy fails, Gi-hun’s only option becomes to convince the other players to vote to stop the games.

The anonymous “gamemaster” delivers a lecture to Gi-hun on the “benevolence” of the games, which offer the poor and downtrodden “trash” of Korean society to redeem themselves through the alleged meritocracy of the gory games. Gi-hun is committed to proving him wrong. But rather than vote to save themselves, the players, racked with debt from medical bills to scam cryptocurrency investments, continue to narrowly vote to stay in the games. Lured by the ever-growing pot of prize money in an enormous glowing piggy bank, players convince themselves and each other that they can play “just one more game” before calling it quits.

The gamemaster, disguised as a player, gloats to Gi-hun that the results of the elections prove his point: the players are selfish, stupid, money-hungry, and not worth saving if they are not even willing to save themselves. In other words, the players are “voting against their own interests” and deserve whatever comes their way.

Yet far from illustrating ordinary people’s fundamental idiocy, the futile elections in Squid Game 2 are a perfect analogy for how capitalism constrains and compels the actions of the working class.

In The Class Matrix, Marxist sociologist Vivek Chibber argues that when a capitalist society lacks credible forms of working-class organization, workers’ pursuit of individual self-interest is a rational decision. Without labor unions and workers’ parties, the costs of taking collective action against the capitalist class become unreasonably high. Only when working-class organization exists do we see a systemic, collective challenge to capitalism.

Chibber is arguing here against the ideas of false consciousness and cultural hegemony. It’s not that workers are confused (the basic premise of Friedrich Engels’s notion of false consciousness), but rather that they are making rational decisions out of their own material interest by taking individualistic action when there is no existing form of organization that would make collective action desirable or even possible.

This is a materialist retelling of a story often dominated by culture, even among Marxist thinkers. For Antonio Gramsci, on a popular reading of his work, the capitalist class uses its dominant position to shape the ideas, beliefs, and values of a society to support capitalism — a process called cultural hegemony, which again suggests that workers have been duped. But for Chibber, it’s actually the material structure of our society that primarily determines what workers do, not their ideas, whether right or wrong. In Chibber’s words, “Workers accept the system not because they find it legitimate or desirable but because they see no other choice.” Capitalism “remains stable because the ‘dull compulsion of economic relations’ keeps bringing workers back to their jobs every day, whether or not they’re happy, whether or not they’re satisfied.”

In Squid Game 2, we see this happening in real time as the players repeatedly vote to continue the games, even after seeing others die right before their eyes. Through the eerie speakers, the anonymous announcer urges players to respect the legitimacy of the “free and fair” elections, while threatening to punish players like Gi-hun for attempting to convince other players to quit. All the while, armed guards stand before the players in a line.

The players are not merely deluded. They’re not thinking irrationally*. Their choice in the game is made in the context of a lack of choice over their economic conditions outside the game. They’re not “voting against their own interests,” but rather soberly assessing their bleak prospects for resistance and betting on individual success instead. Gi-hun’s task — the task of politics — is to make collective action a viable, rational choice.

Source:


* An opinion from the blog here. If we examine closely, the players (or some of them) actually do think irrationally. Not only they choose to risk their lives in hope to maximize their profit, but their are doing it against all odds. And the odds are against them all the way, even when less and less players remain in each stage of the game. And that's exactly the biggest achievement of capitalism, especially during the neoliberal era: to make people believe that they act rationally, while in essence they act irrationally and against their own interest.
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tech CEOs admit they want AI monopoly: US plans to block China's competition & 'steal' engineers

Geopolitical Economy Report   Big Tech oligarchs in Silicon Valley fear competition from Chinese AI companies like DeepSeek, so they're working with the US government to cut off competitors. Billionaire Donald Trump backer Peter Thiel admits they want monopolies, arguing "competition is for losers". Ben Norton explains. 

We asked DeepSeek if China will fully decouple from US dollar - Here is the answer we got in 19 secs

globinfo freexchange     The exact question was: Will China fully decouple from US dollar? The analysis we got in just 19 seconds is pretty impressive:   The question of whether China will "fully decouple" from the U.S. dollar is complex and hinges on geopolitical, economic, and strategic factors. While China has been actively diversifying its financial systems and reducing reliance on the dollar, a complete decoupling in the near term appears unlikely. Here's a balanced analysis: 1. Trends Toward Reduced Dollar Dependence De-dollarization Efforts : China has promoted the use of its currency, the  renminbi (RMB) , in international trade and finance. Initiatives like bilateral currency swaps (e.g., with Russia, Argentina, and others), the  Cross-Border Interbank Payment System (CIPS) , and the digital yuan (e-CNY) aim to reduce dollar dependency. Commodity Trade : China increasingly settles energy and commodity trades (e.g., with Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Russia) ...

Trump BETRAYS MAGA & “America First” Over Gaza!

The Jimmy Dore Show  

Zuckerberg changes camp in the capitalist civil war, joins the Musk-led oligarchy

globinfo freexchange   It was Mark Zuckerberg this time that decided to change camp in the capitalist civil war, in order to join the Musk-led oligarchy under the oncoming presidency of oligarchy's puppet.   The move by Meta to end its third-party fact-checking program and move to a so-called community notes model, has been justifiably widely interpreted as an attempt by Zuckerberg to ingratiate himself with the incoming Trump administration, which has long denounced the moderation policy as censorship with a left-wing bias.   From the first moments in his interview with Joe Rogan, Zuckerberg attempted to justify his previous policy regarding censorship practices in Facebook, claiming that he was receiving high pressure from the Democratic party to do so! The ex-liberal billionaire oligarch made an impressive 180 degrees turn, claiming that he knew that there was something wrong with the specific policy and that he tried to fight back against the pressure to imple...

In France, Ordinary Consumers Fund Tax Breaks for the Wealthy

Emmanuel Macron’s government gave tax breaks for France’s wealthiest while counting on purchase taxes paid by ordinary consumers. Now saying it has a budget hole to fill, his administration is again expecting working-class people to pick up the bill.   by Marlon Ettinger Part 1 President Emmanuel Macron picked François Bayrou as France’s new prime minister earlier this month, despite his lack of any parliamentary majority. Bayrou’s appointment on December 13 came just over a week after his predecessor Michel Barnier’s government was felled by a no-confidence vote proposed by the Left and joined by the far right, after Barnier tried to force through his budget without having the numbers in the National Assembly.  The most likely outcome now is that Bayrou, who comes from a party called the Democratic Movement, will reimpose last year’s budget by decree. The National Assembly has already assented to continuing last year’s budget by an emergency vote. France’s in many ways undemo...

Hamas Intends to Uphold Agreement, Senior Official Tells Drop Site in 30-Minute Interview

In an exclusive interview with Drop Site News , a senior Hamas official said that the group intends to uphold its side of the “ceasefire” deal—despite claims by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that he received assurances from both President Joe Biden and President-elect Donald Trump that Israel can resume its war against Gaza after the first phase of the agreement. “We are committed to this deal. We will exert the maximum efforts to give this deal a chance to succeed. We are looking for how to prevent the war again, how to protect our people. We will do the best to protect this deal,” said Dr. Basem Naim, a member of Hamas’s political bureau. “What kind of side deals they have done, this is their business. But what I can say here: the American administration led by Biden, we consider complicit—directly complicit—in the genocide.”   [...]   Naim said that Hamas’s armed wing, the Qassam Brigades, as well as other resistance groups, are prepared to resume fighting if Is...

Raffi Berg: BBC Middle East Editor Exposed as CIA, Mossad Collaborator

A senior BBC editor at the center of an ongoing scandal into the network’s systematic pro-Israel bias is, in fact, a former member of a CIA propaganda outfit, MintPress News can reveal. Raffi Berg, an Englishman who heads the BBC’s Middle East desk, formerly worked for the U.S. State Department’s Foreign Broadcast Information Service, a unit that, by his own admission, was a CIA front group. Berg is currently the subject of considerable scrutiny after thirteen BBC employees spoke out, claiming, among other things, that his “entire job is to water down everything that’s too critical of Israel” and that he holds “wild” amounts of power at the British state broadcaster, that there exists a culture of “extreme fear” at the BBC about publishing anything critical of Israel, and that Berg himself plays a key role in turning its coverage into “systematic Israeli propaganda.” The BBC has disputed these claims.   by Alan Macleod    Part 5 - A Worldwide Network   Whatever the v...

A deal delayed, dreams destroyed

The Grayzone   Max Blumenthal and Aaron Mate discuss the Gaza ceasefire deal, the real history of US and Israeli obstructionism, and efforts to hold the authors of Gaza's destruction accountable - including Blumenthal's questioning of Tony Blinken at the Secretary of State's final presser.

Did a Trump executive order just cripple the global US regime change network?

With federal funding paused to USAID, pro-Western media outlets from Ukraine to Nicaragua are panhandling for donations, and a multi-billion dollar regime change apparatus is in panic mode.   Part 1   Among the flurry of executive orders issued by President Donald Trump in the first days of his administration, perhaps the most consequential to date is one titled, “reevaluating and realigning US foreign aid.” Under this order, a 90-day pause was instantly enforced on all US foreign development assistance across the globe – excepting, of course, the largest recipients of US aid in Israel and Egypt. For now, the order forbids the disbursement of federal funding for any “non-governmental organizations, international organizations, and contractors” charged with delivering US “aid” programs overseas.  Within days, hundreds of “internal contractors” at the US Agency for International Development (USAID) were placed on unpaid leave or outright fired, as a direct result of the Exe...

Global South States Resist Israeli Impunity Over War Crimes

During its genocidal campaign in Gaza, Israel has repeatedly flouted the rulings of international courts. While Western states indulge Israeli impunity, a coalition of states backed by left-wing parties is spearheading action to hold Israel to account.  by Harrison Stetler Part 1 Representatives of nine Global South countries convened in the Hague last Friday to launch a coalition that will apply collective pressure on Israel over its gross violations of international law. The founding members of the Hague Group include the governments of Belize, Bolivia, Colombia, Cuba, Honduras, Malaysia, Namibia, Senegal, and South Africa. Their initiative aims to establish a common platform to enforce “coordinated legal and diplomatic measures,” including sanctions, in retaliation for the Israeli state’s fifteen-month-long invasion of Gaza, its decades-old occupation of the West Bank, and its blocking of the creation of a Palestinian state. “This is a group for collective action. Collective act...