Skip to main content

Squid Game 2, an Allegory of Capitalism Versus Democracy

In the nail-biting new season of Netflix’s hit series Squid Game, players’ desperate circumstances push them to make fatally risky bets on individual success even when collective action might save them.
 
by Caitlyn Clark 

If the debut season of the Korean Netflix series Squid Game laid bare the ails of modern capitalism, its highly anticipated second season reflects the challenges to organizing against it.

Initially released in 2021, Squid Game became an overnight global phenomenon. In the dystopian survival show, financially desperate players enter into a series of challenges adapted from Korean children’s games in hopes of winning a hefty cash prize. The stakes are lethal: lose a game, and you’re eliminated — permanently. 

Any time one of the roughly four hundred players dies, the total prize money is raised by 100,000,000 Korean won (approximately US$70,000). After each round, players are given the option to take a popular vote on whether or not to continue the games. If players vote to end the game before all six rounds are completed, the prize money will be divided evenly among the remaining players.

In season one, the players successfully vote to discontinue the game after just the first round. However, upon returning to the reality of debt and financial despair of their everyday lives, they decide to come back to the games. Rather than scrounging for pennies in the real world, players stake their lives for the chance to free themselves from poverty and debt. It’s the crushing exploitation and unfairness of the capitalist system that brings the players back to the game.

Squid Game 2 makes even greater use of voting, dramatizing the role of elections in upholding capitalism. 
 
(If you want to avoid spoilers, stop reading now.) 
 
In the second season, protagonist Seong Gi-hun returns after winning the first season’s games and the 38 billion won (approximately US$26 million) prize money. His aim is not more wealth; he wants to find the ring of sadistic ultrarich elites running the games and end them for good. After an insurgent paramilitary strategy fails, Gi-hun’s only option becomes to convince the other players to vote to stop the games.

The anonymous “gamemaster” delivers a lecture to Gi-hun on the “benevolence” of the games, which offer the poor and downtrodden “trash” of Korean society to redeem themselves through the alleged meritocracy of the gory games. Gi-hun is committed to proving him wrong. But rather than vote to save themselves, the players, racked with debt from medical bills to scam cryptocurrency investments, continue to narrowly vote to stay in the games. Lured by the ever-growing pot of prize money in an enormous glowing piggy bank, players convince themselves and each other that they can play “just one more game” before calling it quits.

The gamemaster, disguised as a player, gloats to Gi-hun that the results of the elections prove his point: the players are selfish, stupid, money-hungry, and not worth saving if they are not even willing to save themselves. In other words, the players are “voting against their own interests” and deserve whatever comes their way.

Yet far from illustrating ordinary people’s fundamental idiocy, the futile elections in Squid Game 2 are a perfect analogy for how capitalism constrains and compels the actions of the working class.

In The Class Matrix, Marxist sociologist Vivek Chibber argues that when a capitalist society lacks credible forms of working-class organization, workers’ pursuit of individual self-interest is a rational decision. Without labor unions and workers’ parties, the costs of taking collective action against the capitalist class become unreasonably high. Only when working-class organization exists do we see a systemic, collective challenge to capitalism.

Chibber is arguing here against the ideas of false consciousness and cultural hegemony. It’s not that workers are confused (the basic premise of Friedrich Engels’s notion of false consciousness), but rather that they are making rational decisions out of their own material interest by taking individualistic action when there is no existing form of organization that would make collective action desirable or even possible.

This is a materialist retelling of a story often dominated by culture, even among Marxist thinkers. For Antonio Gramsci, on a popular reading of his work, the capitalist class uses its dominant position to shape the ideas, beliefs, and values of a society to support capitalism — a process called cultural hegemony, which again suggests that workers have been duped. But for Chibber, it’s actually the material structure of our society that primarily determines what workers do, not their ideas, whether right or wrong. In Chibber’s words, “Workers accept the system not because they find it legitimate or desirable but because they see no other choice.” Capitalism “remains stable because the ‘dull compulsion of economic relations’ keeps bringing workers back to their jobs every day, whether or not they’re happy, whether or not they’re satisfied.”

In Squid Game 2, we see this happening in real time as the players repeatedly vote to continue the games, even after seeing others die right before their eyes. Through the eerie speakers, the anonymous announcer urges players to respect the legitimacy of the “free and fair” elections, while threatening to punish players like Gi-hun for attempting to convince other players to quit. All the while, armed guards stand before the players in a line.

The players are not merely deluded. They’re not thinking irrationally*. Their choice in the game is made in the context of a lack of choice over their economic conditions outside the game. They’re not “voting against their own interests,” but rather soberly assessing their bleak prospects for resistance and betting on individual success instead. Gi-hun’s task — the task of politics — is to make collective action a viable, rational choice.

Source:


* An opinion from the blog here. If we examine closely, the players (or some of them) actually do think irrationally. Not only they choose to risk their lives in hope to maximize their profit, but their are doing it against all odds. And the odds are against them all the way, even when less and less players remain in each stage of the game. And that's exactly the biggest achievement of capitalism, especially during the neoliberal era: to make people believe that they act rationally, while in essence they act irrationally and against their own interest.
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trump's tariffs: A unique opportunity for BRICS and the Global South to fully escape from dollar tyranny

globinfo freexchange   Does Trump know what he is doing? Well, yes and no. While many interpretate his latest move, mostly as an attempt to halt China, his main goal is to give the final blow to the neoliberal order on behalf of his oligarchs .  From this perspective, Trump's unprecedented decision to decide mass tariffs against almost everyone, was an act of strategic hit against the global free market neoliberalism, with the financial capital  at its top. And that's because this dominant-for-almost-half-century system, identifies restrictions and protectionism as major threats against its own existence. In other words, Trump acted as a commander of the capitalist faction that wants to beat its neoliberal rivals and put itself in charge, through a new transformation of capitalism into a 21st century corporate feudalism.   Concerning China, Trump's move may have some negative impact on its economy for a while, since China has chosen to partially play by the rule...

Deranged euroclowns want to revive a nazi-origin project!

globinfo freexchange   Behind the ridiculously cartoonish latest spot of the EU that gives "instructions" to the European citizens on how to deal with a major crisis during the first hours, lies a secret desire.    The deranged euroclowns of the crypto-fascist extreme center , are trying to build up a condition of consent inside the minds of Europeans, which is related to their biggest wet dream: an autonomous imperialist European army. The idea was not born suddenly because of Trump's hostile attitude against his own allies. From the early 50s, pan-European networks of neo-Nazis were created. In May 1951, the European Social Movement (MSE) was founded in Malmö, Sweden. Essentially, it was about projecting the ideology of the German SRP on a pan-European level. The MSE, which would remain active until the 1980s, proclaimed the need for Europe to emancipate itself from the divisive tutelage of the USA and the USSR, called for the defense of the “European race” against th...

Neoliberalism Needs To Go

Second Thought  

Netanyahu BRAGS About Genocide - And Our Media COVERS IT UP

Owen Jones  

Google Imports Ex Israeli Spies, The Genocide Resumes, Cruel Britannia

by Nate Bear   Part 3 - Cruel Britannia   The UK is moving ahead with large welfare cuts for disabled people, including those with cancer. On TV the other day, the UK’s health secretary Wes Streeting said that people with cancer should be in work, not at home resting. Alongside this, the government has said that to cut youth employment it will push young people to join the army. This, of course, is in the context of a massive expenditure on military weapons in the face of the Russian bogeyman.   What’s happening in the UK under a nominally centre-left Labour government is a good reminder that there is never a lesser evil if your leaders are neoliberals. Balancing the books on the backs of the poorest and most vulnerable in society is the north star of all neoliberals, whether they call themselves centrists, left wing or right wing. Cruelty is the policy and the point.    Yet the last few years have also been a good reminder that everything is a choice. Cov...

Trump Speeds Up FALL OF THE WEST With Tariff War

Owen Jones     Related:   Trump's tariffs: A unique opportunity for BRICS and the Global South to fully escape from dollar tyranny

UN rapporteur Francesca Albanese: World is watching a live genocide in Gaza and doing nothing

The New Arab   As Israel’s war on Gaza enters its 19th month, UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese is sounding the alarm louder than ever: the world is watching a live genocide — and doing nothing to stop it. In an exclusive interview with The New Arab , Albanese describes the devastation in Gaza as unparalleled since WWII. Entire neighbourhoods lie in ruins, tens of thousands are dead, and 91% of Gaza’s population is at risk of malnutrition. Over 60,000 children show signs of cognitive impairment due to starvation.  “This is not just war. This is genocide in real time,” she says. “What we are seeing now is the destruction of a people who refuse to leave.” Despite UN mandates and international law, Albanese says the global system is paralysed, and governments, corporations, and even universities are complicit. “If Palestine were a crime scene, it would bear all our fingerprints.”

US Official EXPOSES Truth About Gaza From The Inside

Owen Jones  

Google Imports Ex Israeli Spies, The Genocide Resumes, Cruel Britannia

by Nate Bear   Part 2 - The genocide resumes   The day before the Wiz deal, Israel resumed its genocide of Gaza with an unhinged bloodthirsty rampage, the deadliest twenty-four hours in the last nearly eighteen months of genocide. A high bar had been set, and it was cleared. They attacked at night, itself an act of utter cowardice and sadism, and slaughtered hundreds as they slept in tents. In tents. Close to one hundred babies and young children were killed. The overall death toll exceeds 400 and is rising. As expected, there is not a flicker of condemnation from world leaders, many of whom are arming Israel with the weapons and intelligence it needs for genocide. The British air force spent the ceasefire period gathering intelligence on Palestinians and feeding it to Israel so they could restart the mass murder efficiently.  The genocide is the end of the west. It destroys any claim to moral superiority over Russia, China, Iran or any of the officially designated bad g...