Candace Owens has gone SUPER VIRAL — and this time, she’s hitting Israel right where it hurts.
From once working alongside some of the most pro-Israel voices in U.S. media to openly challenging Tel Aviv’s narrative, Candace’s shift has been nothing short of seismic. After leaving Ben Shapiro’s Daily Wire in early 2024, she’s unleashed a wave of unfiltered criticism — questioning official accounts of October 7, highlighting Israeli war crimes in Gaza, and demanding accountability for journalists and aid workers killed in targeted strikes.
In her latest viral clip, Candace Owens blasts the Israeli Defense Forces for what she calls “cold-blooded assassinations” of reporters, tying it into a larger pattern of brutality and propaganda. She even raises the explosive claim that Netanyahu’s government may have allowed October 7 to happen as a pretext to seize more Palestinian land — a theory fiercely denied by Israel but echoed by skeptics worldwide.
Her stance is polarizing. Supporters hail her as a truth-teller breaking the taboo on criticizing Israel without being smeared as antisemitic. Critics — including Jewish advocacy groups — accuse her of spreading dangerous narratives and playing into old prejudices. But one thing is certain: she’s forcing this debate into the mainstream.
From once working alongside some of the most pro-Israel voices in U.S. media to openly challenging Tel Aviv’s narrative, Candace’s shift has been nothing short of seismic. After leaving Ben Shapiro’s Daily Wire in early 2024, she’s unleashed a wave of unfiltered criticism — questioning official accounts of October 7, highlighting Israeli war crimes in Gaza, and demanding accountability for journalists and aid workers killed in targeted strikes.
In her latest viral clip, Candace Owens blasts the Israeli Defense Forces for what she calls “cold-blooded assassinations” of reporters, tying it into a larger pattern of brutality and propaganda. She even raises the explosive claim that Netanyahu’s government may have allowed October 7 to happen as a pretext to seize more Palestinian land — a theory fiercely denied by Israel but echoed by skeptics worldwide.
Her stance is polarizing. Supporters hail her as a truth-teller breaking the taboo on criticizing Israel without being smeared as antisemitic. Critics — including Jewish advocacy groups — accuse her of spreading dangerous narratives and playing into old prejudices. But one thing is certain: she’s forcing this debate into the mainstream.
Comments
Post a Comment