Creating
a distorted image of the humanitarian crisis is the starting point.
Painting a picture of a country on the verge of collapse is the
alibi.
by Misión
Verdad
The coup plot against Venezuela has already been written
and presented. On March 2, 2017, during the first round of OAS talks,
Shannon K. O'Neil (Latin America director of the Council on Foreign
Relations, CFR) presented the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee
with a portfolio of actions and measures to be taken by the United
States if it wanted to remove Chavismo from political power in
Venezuela.
Part
3 - The coup plot
The CFR proposes three major political actions for the
U.S. to execute a coup in Venezuela in the immediate future. Options
that, because of the political and financial weight embodied in CFR,
are already in full operation (and running for months). Indeed the
CFR have directed the anti-Chavista leadership to strictly follow
this coup manual.
1. CFR proposes to continue sanctions on "human
rights violators, narco-traffickers and corrupt officials" to
increase pressure on the Venezuelan government. Anti-Chavez leaders,
following that script, have backed these actions and the false
positive in question, since there is no evidence linking Venezuelan
Vice President Tareck El Aissami to international drug trafficking.
Even leaders like Freddy Guevara have gone to Washington directly to
"demand" that the sanctions be extended, under the support
of the anti-Venezuelan lobby led by Marco Rubio.
2. The United States must take a tougher stance within
the OAS to implement the Democratic Charter against Venezuela,
co-opting countries in the Caribbean and Central America to support
this initiative, which in recent OAS (illegal) sessions have resisted
supporting. Marco Rubio's threat against Haiti, the Dominican
Republic, and El Salvador was not an isolated action, but a
coordinated maneuver led by the State Department to increase pressure
against Venezuela's international alliances.
The CFR also proposes that the Treasury Department
convinces China to withdraw its support for Venezuela to increase
political and economic pressure on the country and the government.
The MUD has been a stellar actor in this part of the script, using
Luis Almagro to demand the Democratic Charter be applied against
Venezuela. The latest statement from the U.S. State Department on the
march convened by the MUD on April 19, aims not only to harden its
stance toward Venezuela to increase pressure from the OAS (trying to
bring together the largest number of allies with this critique), but
legitimizes, with premeditation, violent and lamentable acts that
could occur in the march. Clinging to false narratives such as the
use of "collectives" to suppress demonstrations and
"tortures" carried out by Venezuelan state security forces,
the State Department proposes calling April 19 a turning point to
escalate the siege against Venezuela and expand sanctions against the
country, making them more aggressive and direct.
3. The CFR states that the United States should work
together with Colombia, Brazil, Guyana and Caribbean countries to
prepare for a possible "refugee increase," channeling
resources to various NGOs and U.N. organizations from the United
States Department of Agriculture State. But beyond this warning of an
intervention in Venezuela, there is a real political operation in
place: the NGO funded by the same Department of State, Human Rights
Watch (HRW), published today, April 18, 2017, a report on how the
"humanitarian crisis" has spread to Brazil. Based on
specific testimonies and by magnifying immigration data, HRW took the
opportunity to call on the governments of the region (with special
emphasis on Brazil) to put pressure on the Venezuelan government, as
required by the strategy proposed by CFR. Luis Florido, leader of
Popular Voluntad, is currently touring Brazil and Colombia to try to
reactivate the diplomatic siege against Venezuela from border
countries.
The U.S. think tank also requires that these countries
under the leadership of the United States and the International
Monetary Fund (IMF) organize a financial guardianship plan for
Venezuela, that hides Russian and Chinese investments in strategic
areas of the country. In recent days, Julio Borges has used his role
in parliament and as a political spokesperson to continue the message
that propagates the false narrative of the "humanitarian crisis"
in Venezuela. It is the same strategy outlined by the CFR, arguing
that the United States should increase its level of involvement in
the internal affairs of Venezuela from the State Department, now
headed by Rex Tillerson, linked to oil company Exxon Mobil (he was
its general manager since 2007 until he took over this public
position), a CFR financier.
These ongoing actions, while unveiling the geopolitical
urgency in the coup strategy against Venezuela (affiliated with the
latest statements by U.S. Southern Command Chief Admiral Kurt Tidd on
the need to displace China and Russia as allies of Latin America),
also reflects how they have delegated the generation of violence,
programmed chaos and diplomatic procedures (in the best of cases and
exclusive use of Luis Florido) to their intermediaries in Venezuela,
specifically, the leaders of the radical parties of anti-Chavism.
These actions led by the United States (and corporations that manage
its foreign policy) lead toward one final aim: intervention by
financial and preventive military means.
Source,
videos:
Comments
Post a Comment