Εlection integrity activist gives firsthand details of how the voting process could have been rigged against Bernie Sanders in the Democratic primaries
Lee Camp
spoke with the election integrity activist, Dr. Lora Chamberlain,
about her experience on the US voting system. Chamberlain gave a
firsthand example from the process in the 2016 primary vote between
Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, and an idea of how the primaries
could have been rigged in favor of Clinton. Chamberlain gives also an
idea of how this totally unreliable system could be fixed:
In
Chicago we went to the audience and we saw the cover up. And so,
they're counting votes on these what we call the “toilet paper
rolls”, but they're like cash register receipts. We saw them
counting these votes and they were putting paper ballots through
another machine. What we saw, was that all of the workers - so this
is a Chicago Board of Elections, and they have 21 tables going, they
have all these workers doing this - and what they would do, is they
had the number that they had to achieve, what we called the official
recommended results.
So, they
had the number that they had to achieve, and what they would do, is
they had these tally sheets and they would put a dot. Let's say one
electronic machine, they said had a hundred votes for Bernie. They
would put a dot where a hundred votes should be. And then, when they
got to that dot (and they were doing their hash marks), they would
just put the votes on some posted notes and then throw
them away - and kind of stopped counting once they got to the
recommended number.
All
of the electronic voting machines, all of the digital scanners they
can all be hacked if there are insiders within election
jurisdictions. And we think there are.
And so,
we want that hard record, that paper ballot. We do want them
digitally scanned so that they form a ballot image, but you can't
stop there. A lot of activists are talking about publishing the
ballot images, but you can't stop there. You got to be pulling some
of those paper ballots by random and counting them. We need actual
audits on the paper ballots and then comparing those to the digital
scans so that we know that the digital scans are not being
manipulated as well.
Chamberlain
also spoke to Hard Lens Media in detail about her experience and the
whole voting process. You can watch the whole discussion in the
following YouTube video. Perhaps it's worth to note that the video
was uploaded on February 16, 2018, yet, when we discovered it
recently, it had been viewed only 58(!) times. It's really remarkable
how such a serious matter attracts so little attention.
Finally,
take a taste of the Venezuelan voting system of the ... “dictator”
Maduro and make the comparisons yourself:
Comments
Post a Comment