Garry
Glass discusses how advances in automation are disrupting class
relations.
Part
6 - Planned obsolescence of the Proletarian subject
If
automation is to be adopted then it should be because the workers
themselves want it, that they may find more useful things to do with
the new efficiency gains. Without worker engagement it is much more
likely to look like planned obsolescence of the worker themselves.
The question
automation poses labour is a crisis for the proletarian subject –
how will we reproduce our lives, in a world dominated by access to a
wage – when gaining full time, well remunerated or secure
employment has become destabilized?
Our
bargaining power within the capitalist system either comes from our
ability to sell our labour, or through our ownership of property.
Whilst the working population have been enchanted by accumulating
goods and using services, they have not been accumulating their own
means of production. The crisis in wages and entrepreneurship along
with collapse of effective unionism means that individual bargaining
power has been eroded significantly.
There is a
prevailing myth that money is a reward for graft, that somehow
getting things for free is a handout from a nanny state funded by
hard working taxpayers. Gains in efficiency that come from all the
innovations and labours of our ancestors must be seen as a common
good and not subject to private ownership.
The left
does need to be propositional if it is to get beyond being reactive.
The right needs people to be kept in drudgery, to internalise the
guilt of debt and to not have enough free time on its hands to
organise rebellion. UBI will lift people out of poverty somewhat but
it is imperative that this is seen as a concession on the road to
greater political and economic freedom. To settle for this as
sufficient can only disempower the working class. Ultimately what
makes a right work ethic in the 21st century needs to be clarified as
does the question of what amount of luxury we actually need to be
satisfied.
***
Source:
Related:
Comments
Post a Comment