by system
failure
Latest
numerous indications show that the US surround Russia, attempting to
isolate the country militarily, politically and economically. The
support of neo-nazis in Ukraine was aiming to drag Russia into an
attrition war in East Ukraine, for a start. Some analysts claim that
Washington's "hawks" prepare a nuclear "preventive"
strike against Russia because they believe that they can obviate
Russian or Chinese retaliation, using the anti-missile shield in East
Europe.
Unfortunatelly,
there are indications that this may be possible. According to latest
information, Washington proceeds in actions to surround China as
well. It is not accidental that these revelations come after the
recent big agreement between Russia and China on the energy sector.
According to some analysts, the US transfer 60% of their naval forces
to the Asian Pasific, while they plan to build a similar
"anti-missile" system in the region.
Why the
American economic elite rushes to "burn" the planet? The
answer is that probably they were surprised by the turn of Russia,
which almost surrendered to the Russian oligarchs and was ready to be
"absorbed" by the neoliberal doctrine. Putin's moves found
the Western oligarchs unready and now they run to cover the distance.
A "preventive" nuclear strike is probably the last solution
in the agenda, in case that the plan for the dissolution of the vast
Russian territory won't work.
The fact
that Putin tries to nationalize the economy and the banking system
completely, in an attempt to protect Russia from the expansion of the
global neoliberal dictatorship, explains to a great extent why the
international banksters have declared war against him.
It seems
that a modest Obama receives high, continuous pressure by the White
House neocon "hawks" and the American economic elite, to
pull the new cold war to the edge, challenging Russia to involve in a
"warm" incident which will give a pretext to Washington to
proceed in a "preventive" nuclear strike. This may be
another reason why Putin hesitates to intervene openly in the East
Ukraine as he did in Crimea.
Additionally
to all these, the new "headache" for Obama, is the sudden
Jihadist onslaught by ISIL in Iraq. In case that ISIL will prevail in
Iraq, the organization will target Western governments, according to
some analysts.
The general
situation in Middle East is also chaotic (inside the civil war, bomb
attacks have started in Homs, a city which already suffered heavily
by the civil war,
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2014/06/19/367719/3-killed-in-w-syria-car-bomb-attack/
as well as in Hama:
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2014/06/20/367797/car-bomb-blast-kills-34-syrians-in-hama/).
Obama is
quite obviously confused by the Jihadist onslaught in Iraq since
"hawks" want to get rid of the dead-end mess that they've
created there, in order to concentrate on Russia. The Obama
announcement concerning his willing to send some military advisers to
Iraq seems at least hypocritical considering that in different
situations Americans were ready to send troops under the slightest
pretext. It seems that they have decided to abandon the
government-puppet there:
It appears
that Obama is trying to gain some time, balancing between
Washington's "hawks" pressure and the chaotic situation in
the East Ukraine and Middle East, until the end of his term, in order
to throw the "hot potato" to the hands of the next US
president.
Unfortunately,
it seems that things are worse than in the period of the first cold
war, and one significant reason for that, is the schizophrenic belief
of Washington's neocons that Russia does not have the power to
respond in a nuclear attack. On the contrary, during the first cold
war period, there were "underground communication channels"
between the two superpowers which were assisting on the mutual
retreat, even in very crucial moments, like in the case of the Cuba
missile crisis, when the Soviets installed nuclear missiles on the
island, as a response to the installation of US nuclear missiles in
Italy and Turkey. It seems that for the moment, there are no such
communication channels between the US and Russia and situation is
getting more and more dangerous.
The American
economic elite, probably prepares the scenery for a more "willing"
puppet in power after the end of the Obama administration. It appears
that, for the moment, the most probable person for this role is
Hillary Clinton, for impression and distraction purposes too (she
will be the first woman president of the United States, if elected,
after Obama, who is the first African-American president).
Hillary
Clinton seems more willing to play the dangerous game of Washington's
"hawks" - she recently liken Putin's actions with Hitler's
during 30s - while we should not forget that Bill Clinton brought a
bloodbath in Bosnia and Yugoslavia through NATO bombings during 90s.
We should not forget also that Clinton was the one who opened the way
for the total dominance of neoliberalism in the West, after the
advices from the bankers:
Related:
I largely agree, with one major exception. It is incorrect to exclusively blame the US financial elite. The European aristocracy, including the Rothschilds, is also apparently in cahoots. The Western Axis Cartel cannot be traced to a single country of origin.
ReplyDeleteIt is always more strategic to identify your enemy precisely.
You are right. However, the article refer to the world financial elites too through phrases like "Western oligarchs", "global neoliberal dictatorship", or, "international banksters".
Delete