US military attack on Venezuela mulled by top Trump advisors and Latin American officials at private DC meeting
Away
from the public eye, the Center for Strategic and International
Studies (CSIS) think tank hosted a top-level, off-the-record meeting
to explore US military options against Venezuela.
by
Max Blumenthal
Part
3
- A Who’s Who of Trump Administration Coup Advisors
The
CSIS check-in list not only confirms that the Trump administration
and its outside advisors are mulling options for a military assault
on Venezuela; it also outlines the cast of characters involved in
crafting the regime change operation against the country.
Few
of these figures are well known by the public, yet many have played
an influential role in US plans to destabilize Venezuela.
The
complete check-in list can be viewed at the end of this article.
Below are profiles of some of the more notable figures and
organizations involved in the private meeting. (Names of attendees
are in bold).
Admiral
Kurt Tidd, Former Commander of US SOUTHCOM:
From 2015-18, Tidd was the commander of the US Naval Forces Southern
Command, overseeing operations in Central and South America. Last
October, Tidd complained, “My Twitter feed is made up of about 50
percent of people accusing me of planning and plotting the invasion
of Venezuela, and the other 50 percent imploring me to plan and plot
the invasion of Venezuela.” Given his participation in the CSIS
meeting on attacking Venezuela, his accusers might have had a point.
On
February 20, Tidd’s successor, Admiral Craig Faller, threatened
Venezuela’s military and urged it to turn on Maduro in support of
the US-backed coup attempt.
Ambassador
William Brownfield:
Appointed as US ambassador to Venezuela under George W. Bush,
promoted to assistant secretary of state for international narcotics
and law enforcement affairs by Barack Obama, and now a CSIS senior
advisor, Brownfield has been at the center of psychological warfare
operations against Venezuela. According to McClatchy, Brownfield
helped devise a scheme in 2017 to generate suspicion within Maduro’s
inner circle by sanctioning all of his key advisors except one:
Diosdado Cabello, the president of the Constituent Assembly once seen
by the US as a potential rival to Maduro. The idea was to create the
suspicion that Cabello was a CIA asset, and “mess with the Chavez
mentality.”
Brownfield
advised Trump’s National Security Council, “Don’t just hit
everyone because you can. Hit the right people and then maybe get
others to just be scared and wonder when they’ll get hit.” Mark
Feierstein, a NSC official at the time who now works as a senior
associate at CSIS and attended its April 10 meeting, was reportedly
involved in the plot. However, the plan fell apart as soon as the US
sanctioned Cabello under pressure from Sen. Marco Rubio.
Fernando
Cutz and Juan Cruz, former National Security Council officials at the
Cohen Group:
Cutz collaborated closely with Brownfield on the plan to generate
rifts in Maduro’s inner circle. Born in Brazil, Cutz is a career
USAID foreign service officer who worked on Cuban policy under Obama
and entered the Trump NSC under its former director, Gen. H.R.
McMaster. Cutz is credited by the Wall Street Journal with presenting
Trump with his initial platter of options for destabilizing
Venezuela, starting with “a financial strike at Venezuela’s oil
exports.” Cutz’s colleague at the Cohen Group, Juan Cruz, was
Trump’s former Latin America director. In March 2018, Cruz became
the first US official to openly call for the Venezuelan military to
disobey Maduro and implement a coup.
Pedro
Burelli, BV Advisors:
A former JP Morgan executive and ex-director of Venezuela’s
national oil company PDVSA, Burelli allegedly helped foot the $52,000
bill for a series of meetings in Mexico in 2010 where Guaido and his
associates plotted to bring down then-President Hugo Chavez through
street chaos. In an interview with The Grayzone, Burelli called the
Mexico meetings “a legitimate activity,” though he refused to
confirm his participation. Today, he makes no secret of his desire
for Maduro’s removal by force, tweeting images of jailed Panamanian
President Manuel Noriega and the murdered Libyan leader Muammar
Ghadafi to suggest preferred outcomes for Venezuela’s president.
Roger
Noriega, American Enterprise Institute:
A veteran of the Iran-Contra scandals and regime change operations
from Haiti to Cuba, where he plotted to sabotage US efforts at
rapproachment – “stability is the enemy and chaos is the friend,”
he said – Noriega has been at the center of Washington’s efforts
to impose its will on Venezuela. Last November, Noriega recommended
that Trump appoint Ambassador Brownfield to lead contingency plans
for a military invasion of the country.
Carlos
Vecchio and Francisco Marquez, Guaido’s shadow embassy in
Washington:
Installed as the symbolic ambassador of the Guaido coup regime in
Washington DC, Vecchio currently oversees no consular facilities and
has no diplomatic authority. He is wanted in Venezuela on arson
charges and was photographed posing with a young man who brutally
beheaded a woman named Liliana Hergueta. Marquez is associated with
Vision Democratica, a DC-based lobbying outfit which employs another
Venezuelan opposition member who attended the CSIS meeting on
military force, Carlos Figueroa.
Sergio
Guzman, Bernardo Rico, and Karin McFarland, USAID:
The US Agency for International Aid and Development (USAID) has been
the leading edge of the Trump administration’s attempts to
undermine Venezuela’s government. After ramping up its activities
in Venezuela in 2007, USAID began contributing between $45-50 million
per year to Venezuelan opposition political, media, and civil society
groups. On February 23, USAID director Mark Green presided over a
deliberately provocative attempt to ram aid shipments by truck across
the Colombian border and into Venezuela. The humanitarian
interventionist spectacle backfired badly, resulting in opposition
hooligans setting fire to the aid shipments with molotov cocktails.
(Green falsely accused Maduro’s forces of burning the aid.) This
February, USAID rolled out plans for a “Red Team…to train aid
workers as special forces” capable of “executing a mix of
offensive, defensive, and stability operations in extremis
conditions.”
Emiliana
Duarte, Caracas Chronicles and advisor to Maria Corina Machado:
Duarte’s name was crossed off the CSIS check-in list, indicating
that she was invited to the private meeting on military options but
did not attend. She is a staff writer for Caracas Chronicles, a
leading English language publication echoing the political line of
Venezuela’s opposition. Duarte has also contributed to the New York
Times, most recently in February, when she argued that the US-backed
coup attempt was, in fact, “Venezuela’s very normal revolution.”
Nowhere in Duarte’s writing has she acknowledged that she is
serving as an advisor to Maria Corina Machado, a close ally of Sen.
Marco Rubio and one of the most extreme figures among Venezuela’s
opposition. In 2014, a series of emails were leaked allegedly
revealing Machado’s role in an alleged assassination plot. “I
think it is time to gather efforts; make the necessary calls, and
obtain financing to annihilate Maduro and the rest will fall apart,”
Machado wrote in one email.
Santiago
Herdoiza, Hills & Company:
While Herdoiza appears to occupy a low level position, he works at a
high powered international strategy firm founded by former George W.
Bush administration officials. The firm works on behalf of clients
like Chevron, Boeing, and Bechtel to “eliminate barriers to market
access and profitability.” In some cases, the firm says it has been
able to persuade governments to lower tariffs and drop opposition to
free trade deals. Through its participation in the private CSIS
meeting, Hills & Company seems to have signaled that it is
willing to also entertain the use of military force to open up
markets for its clients.
David
Smolansky, OAS coordinator for Venezuelan migrants:
Once a leader of Guaido’s US-backed Popular Will party, Smolansky
took sanctuary in Washington and began working for regime change in
2017. Following the US recognition of Guaido as “interim
president,” Smolansky was appointed by OAS President Luis Almagro
as coordinator for Venezuelan migrants. While it is unknown what
advice Smolansky offered at CSIS regarding a military assault on his
country, there is a near-consensus in Washington that an attack would
massively exacerbate the migration crisis. A war on Venezuela “would
be prolonged, it would be ugly, there would be massive casualties,”
Rebecca Chavez, a fellow at the Inter-American Dialogue, declared in
testimony before the House Foreign Affairs Committee in March.
(Chavez’s boss, Michael Shifter, was a participant in the CSIS
meeting on use of force).
globinfo freexchange Does Trump know what he is doing? Well, yes and no. While many interpretate his latest move, mostly as an attempt to halt China, his main goal is to give the final blow to the neoliberal order on behalf of his oligarchs . From this perspective, Trump's unprecedented decision to decide mass tariffs against almost everyone, was an act of strategic hit against the global free market neoliberalism, with the financial capital at its top. And that's because this dominant-for-almost-half-century system, identifies restrictions and protectionism as major threats against its own existence. In other words, Trump acted as a commander of the capitalist faction that wants to beat its neoliberal rivals and put itself in charge, through a new transformation of capitalism into a 21st century corporate feudalism. Concerning China, Trump's move may have some negative impact on its economy for a while, since China has chosen to partially play by the rule...
globinfo freexchange Behind the ridiculously cartoonish latest spot of the EU that gives "instructions" to the European citizens on how to deal with a major crisis during the first hours, lies a secret desire. The deranged euroclowns of the crypto-fascist extreme center , are trying to build up a condition of consent inside the minds of Europeans, which is related to their biggest wet dream: an autonomous imperialist European army. The idea was not born suddenly because of Trump's hostile attitude against his own allies. From the early 50s, pan-European networks of neo-Nazis were created. In May 1951, the European Social Movement (MSE) was founded in Malmö, Sweden. Essentially, it was about projecting the ideology of the German SRP on a pan-European level. The MSE, which would remain active until the 1980s, proclaimed the need for Europe to emancipate itself from the divisive tutelage of the USA and the USSR, called for the defense of the “European race” against th...
by Nate Bear Part 3 - Cruel Britannia The UK is moving ahead with large welfare cuts for disabled people, including those with cancer. On TV the other day, the UK’s health secretary Wes Streeting said that people with cancer should be in work, not at home resting. Alongside this, the government has said that to cut youth employment it will push young people to join the army. This, of course, is in the context of a massive expenditure on military weapons in the face of the Russian bogeyman. What’s happening in the UK under a nominally centre-left Labour government is a good reminder that there is never a lesser evil if your leaders are neoliberals. Balancing the books on the backs of the poorest and most vulnerable in society is the north star of all neoliberals, whether they call themselves centrists, left wing or right wing. Cruelty is the policy and the point. Yet the last few years have also been a good reminder that everything is a choice. Cov...
The New Arab As Israel’s war on Gaza enters its 19th month, UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese is sounding the alarm louder than ever: the world is watching a live genocide — and doing nothing to stop it. In an exclusive interview with The New Arab , Albanese describes the devastation in Gaza as unparalleled since WWII. Entire neighbourhoods lie in ruins, tens of thousands are dead, and 91% of Gaza’s population is at risk of malnutrition. Over 60,000 children show signs of cognitive impairment due to starvation. “This is not just war. This is genocide in real time,” she says. “What we are seeing now is the destruction of a people who refuse to leave.” Despite UN mandates and international law, Albanese says the global system is paralysed, and governments, corporations, and even universities are complicit. “If Palestine were a crime scene, it would bear all our fingerprints.”
🚨To whom who concerned 🚨 Khan Yunis and Rafah are now burning. — Palestine Daily News ✌️🇵🇸✌️ (@Palestinedaily1) April 2, 2025 Khan Yunis and Rafah are now burning. For those interested — Muhammad in Gaza🇵🇸 (@7MohammedKhaled) April 2, 2025
by Nate Bear Part 2 - The genocide resumes The day before the Wiz deal, Israel resumed its genocide of Gaza with an unhinged bloodthirsty rampage, the deadliest twenty-four hours in the last nearly eighteen months of genocide. A high bar had been set, and it was cleared. They attacked at night, itself an act of utter cowardice and sadism, and slaughtered hundreds as they slept in tents. In tents. Close to one hundred babies and young children were killed. The overall death toll exceeds 400 and is rising. As expected, there is not a flicker of condemnation from world leaders, many of whom are arming Israel with the weapons and intelligence it needs for genocide. The British air force spent the ceasefire period gathering intelligence on Palestinians and feeding it to Israel so they could restart the mass murder efficiently. The genocide is the end of the west. It destroys any claim to moral superiority over Russia, China, Iran or any of the officially designated bad g...
Comments
Post a Comment