US military attack on Venezuela mulled by top Trump advisors and Latin American officials at private DC meeting
Away
from the public eye, the Center for Strategic and International
Studies (CSIS) think tank hosted a top-level, off-the-record meeting
to explore US military options against Venezuela.
by
Max Blumenthal
Part
3
- A Who’s Who of Trump Administration Coup Advisors
The
CSIS check-in list not only confirms that the Trump administration
and its outside advisors are mulling options for a military assault
on Venezuela; it also outlines the cast of characters involved in
crafting the regime change operation against the country.
Few
of these figures are well known by the public, yet many have played
an influential role in US plans to destabilize Venezuela.
The
complete check-in list can be viewed at the end of this article.
Below are profiles of some of the more notable figures and
organizations involved in the private meeting. (Names of attendees
are in bold).
Admiral
Kurt Tidd, Former Commander of US SOUTHCOM:
From 2015-18, Tidd was the commander of the US Naval Forces Southern
Command, overseeing operations in Central and South America. Last
October, Tidd complained, “My Twitter feed is made up of about 50
percent of people accusing me of planning and plotting the invasion
of Venezuela, and the other 50 percent imploring me to plan and plot
the invasion of Venezuela.” Given his participation in the CSIS
meeting on attacking Venezuela, his accusers might have had a point.
On
February 20, Tidd’s successor, Admiral Craig Faller, threatened
Venezuela’s military and urged it to turn on Maduro in support of
the US-backed coup attempt.
Ambassador
William Brownfield:
Appointed as US ambassador to Venezuela under George W. Bush,
promoted to assistant secretary of state for international narcotics
and law enforcement affairs by Barack Obama, and now a CSIS senior
advisor, Brownfield has been at the center of psychological warfare
operations against Venezuela. According to McClatchy, Brownfield
helped devise a scheme in 2017 to generate suspicion within Maduro’s
inner circle by sanctioning all of his key advisors except one:
Diosdado Cabello, the president of the Constituent Assembly once seen
by the US as a potential rival to Maduro. The idea was to create the
suspicion that Cabello was a CIA asset, and “mess with the Chavez
mentality.”
Brownfield
advised Trump’s National Security Council, “Don’t just hit
everyone because you can. Hit the right people and then maybe get
others to just be scared and wonder when they’ll get hit.” Mark
Feierstein, a NSC official at the time who now works as a senior
associate at CSIS and attended its April 10 meeting, was reportedly
involved in the plot. However, the plan fell apart as soon as the US
sanctioned Cabello under pressure from Sen. Marco Rubio.
Fernando
Cutz and Juan Cruz, former National Security Council officials at the
Cohen Group:
Cutz collaborated closely with Brownfield on the plan to generate
rifts in Maduro’s inner circle. Born in Brazil, Cutz is a career
USAID foreign service officer who worked on Cuban policy under Obama
and entered the Trump NSC under its former director, Gen. H.R.
McMaster. Cutz is credited by the Wall Street Journal with presenting
Trump with his initial platter of options for destabilizing
Venezuela, starting with “a financial strike at Venezuela’s oil
exports.” Cutz’s colleague at the Cohen Group, Juan Cruz, was
Trump’s former Latin America director. In March 2018, Cruz became
the first US official to openly call for the Venezuelan military to
disobey Maduro and implement a coup.
Pedro
Burelli, BV Advisors:
A former JP Morgan executive and ex-director of Venezuela’s
national oil company PDVSA, Burelli allegedly helped foot the $52,000
bill for a series of meetings in Mexico in 2010 where Guaido and his
associates plotted to bring down then-President Hugo Chavez through
street chaos. In an interview with The Grayzone, Burelli called the
Mexico meetings “a legitimate activity,” though he refused to
confirm his participation. Today, he makes no secret of his desire
for Maduro’s removal by force, tweeting images of jailed Panamanian
President Manuel Noriega and the murdered Libyan leader Muammar
Ghadafi to suggest preferred outcomes for Venezuela’s president.
Roger
Noriega, American Enterprise Institute:
A veteran of the Iran-Contra scandals and regime change operations
from Haiti to Cuba, where he plotted to sabotage US efforts at
rapproachment – “stability is the enemy and chaos is the friend,”
he said – Noriega has been at the center of Washington’s efforts
to impose its will on Venezuela. Last November, Noriega recommended
that Trump appoint Ambassador Brownfield to lead contingency plans
for a military invasion of the country.
Carlos
Vecchio and Francisco Marquez, Guaido’s shadow embassy in
Washington:
Installed as the symbolic ambassador of the Guaido coup regime in
Washington DC, Vecchio currently oversees no consular facilities and
has no diplomatic authority. He is wanted in Venezuela on arson
charges and was photographed posing with a young man who brutally
beheaded a woman named Liliana Hergueta. Marquez is associated with
Vision Democratica, a DC-based lobbying outfit which employs another
Venezuelan opposition member who attended the CSIS meeting on
military force, Carlos Figueroa.
Sergio
Guzman, Bernardo Rico, and Karin McFarland, USAID:
The US Agency for International Aid and Development (USAID) has been
the leading edge of the Trump administration’s attempts to
undermine Venezuela’s government. After ramping up its activities
in Venezuela in 2007, USAID began contributing between $45-50 million
per year to Venezuelan opposition political, media, and civil society
groups. On February 23, USAID director Mark Green presided over a
deliberately provocative attempt to ram aid shipments by truck across
the Colombian border and into Venezuela. The humanitarian
interventionist spectacle backfired badly, resulting in opposition
hooligans setting fire to the aid shipments with molotov cocktails.
(Green falsely accused Maduro’s forces of burning the aid.) This
February, USAID rolled out plans for a “Red Team…to train aid
workers as special forces” capable of “executing a mix of
offensive, defensive, and stability operations in extremis
conditions.”
Emiliana
Duarte, Caracas Chronicles and advisor to Maria Corina Machado:
Duarte’s name was crossed off the CSIS check-in list, indicating
that she was invited to the private meeting on military options but
did not attend. She is a staff writer for Caracas Chronicles, a
leading English language publication echoing the political line of
Venezuela’s opposition. Duarte has also contributed to the New York
Times, most recently in February, when she argued that the US-backed
coup attempt was, in fact, “Venezuela’s very normal revolution.”
Nowhere in Duarte’s writing has she acknowledged that she is
serving as an advisor to Maria Corina Machado, a close ally of Sen.
Marco Rubio and one of the most extreme figures among Venezuela’s
opposition. In 2014, a series of emails were leaked allegedly
revealing Machado’s role in an alleged assassination plot. “I
think it is time to gather efforts; make the necessary calls, and
obtain financing to annihilate Maduro and the rest will fall apart,”
Machado wrote in one email.
Santiago
Herdoiza, Hills & Company:
While Herdoiza appears to occupy a low level position, he works at a
high powered international strategy firm founded by former George W.
Bush administration officials. The firm works on behalf of clients
like Chevron, Boeing, and Bechtel to “eliminate barriers to market
access and profitability.” In some cases, the firm says it has been
able to persuade governments to lower tariffs and drop opposition to
free trade deals. Through its participation in the private CSIS
meeting, Hills & Company seems to have signaled that it is
willing to also entertain the use of military force to open up
markets for its clients.
David
Smolansky, OAS coordinator for Venezuelan migrants:
Once a leader of Guaido’s US-backed Popular Will party, Smolansky
took sanctuary in Washington and began working for regime change in
2017. Following the US recognition of Guaido as “interim
president,” Smolansky was appointed by OAS President Luis Almagro
as coordinator for Venezuelan migrants. While it is unknown what
advice Smolansky offered at CSIS regarding a military assault on his
country, there is a near-consensus in Washington that an attack would
massively exacerbate the migration crisis. A war on Venezuela “would
be prolonged, it would be ugly, there would be massive casualties,”
Rebecca Chavez, a fellow at the Inter-American Dialogue, declared in
testimony before the House Foreign Affairs Committee in March.
(Chavez’s boss, Michael Shifter, was a participant in the CSIS
meeting on use of force).
The latest Wikileaks Vault7 release reveals details of the CIA’s alleged Cherry Blossom project, a scheme that uses wireless devices to access users’ internet activity. globinfo freexchange As cyber security expert John McAfee told to RT and Natasha Sweatte: Virtually, every router that's in use in the American home are accessible to hackers, to the CIA, that they can take over the control of the router, they can monitor all of the traffic, and worse, they can download malware into any device that is connected to that router. I personally, never connect to any Wi-Fi system, I use the LTE on my phone. That's the only way that I can be secure because every router in America has been compromised. We've been warning about it for years, nobody pays attention until something like WikiLeaks comes up and says 'look, this is what's happening'. And it is devastating in terms of the impact on American privacy because once the router...
globinfo freexchange We wouldn't expect to be confirmed so fast on this. A few days ago in the article IT and social media supergiants have just made Alex Jones a hero in the eyes of the ultra-conservative audience , we wrote that Alex Jones' wet dream has just become reality thanks to the combined move by Facebook, Apple, YouTube and Spotify to ban Infowars. These private IT and social media companies couldn't give a better gift to him right now. At a time where Infowars was going through a saturated period according to the best scenario, the corporate giants actually saved it with that stupid(?) strategy. Suddenly, a corporate branch of the liberal establishment gave real value to Alex Jones' awful performance, pretending to be the 'anti-establishment' hero - just like Donald Trump - and made him a real hero in the eyes of the ultra-conservative audience that has been brainwashed by his absurd conspiracy theories. Only a couple of days later...
globinfo freexchange According to world famous physicist Stephen Hawking, the rising use of automated machines may mean the end of human rights – not just jobs. But he’s not talking about robots with artificial intelligence taking over the world, he’s talking about the current capitalist political system and its major players. On Reddit, Hawking said that the economic gap between the rich and the poor will continue to grow as more jobs are automated by machines, and the owners of said machines hoard them to create more wealth for themselves. The insatiable thirst for capitalist accumulation bestowed upon humans by years of lies and terrible economic policy has affected technology in such a way that one of its major goals has become to replace human jobs. If we do not take this warning seriously, we may face unfathomable corporate domination. If we let the same people who buy and sell our political system and resources maintain control of automated technology, the...
Joel Whitney is a co-founder of the magazine Guernica, a magazine of global arts and politics, and has written for many publications, including the New York Times and Wall Street Journal. His book Finks: How the C.I.A. Tricked the World's Best Writers describes how the CIA contributed funds to numerous respected magazines during the Cold War, including the Paris Review, to subtly promote anti-communist views. In their conversation, Whitney tells Robert Scheer about the ties the CIA’s Congress for Cultural Freedom had with literary magazines. He talks about the CIA's attempt during the Cold War to have at least one agent in every major news organization in order to get stories killed if they were too critical or get them to run if they were favorable to the agency. And they discuss the overstatement of the immediate risks and dangers of communist regimes during the Cold War, which, initially, led many people to support the Vietnam War. globinfo freexchange...
globinfo freexchange In the early nineties, an epidemic of mental disorder was sweeping America and Britain. It had been uncovered by a new system for identifying disorders. Psychiatry had been attacked for relying on the personal and fallible judgement of psychiatrists. But instead, a new objective method based on checklists had been invented. These listed only the objective symptoms, and deliberately did not enquire into why the individuals felt an anxiety. In the late 80s, nationwide surveys had revealed an incredible picture: more than 50% of Americans suffered from mental disorders. But at the very same, the drug companies had announced that they had created a new type of drug, called an SSRI, which they claimed, targeted the circuits inside the brain that were causing these malfunctions. The SSRIs were marketed under names like "Prozac". What they did was alter the amounts of serotonin that flowed across the circuit connections within the brain, and they...
globinfo freexchange As we wrote in our previous article, after almost eight years, the US imperialists and the NATO criminals got what they wanted. They finally managed to drag Russia into a war with Ukraine. We now have indisputable evidence for that, through a document by the top US think tank, RAND Corporation. In the preface of a 2019 report under the title Extending Russia, Competing from Advantageous Ground we read: [emphasis added] The purpose of the project was to examine a range of possible means to extend Russia. By this, we mean nonviolent measures that could stress Russia’s military or economy or the regime’s political standing at home and abroad. The steps we posit would not have either defense or deterrence as their prime purpose, although they might contribute to both. Rather, these steps ar...
The Grayzone The Grayzone 's Max Blumenthal on the total collapse of support for Israel among young American progressives, and the crisis Israel faces for the first time among conservative youth.
Hyper-automation impact on unemployment rise - further shrinking of the middle class - creation of a working elite - substitution of saturated Western consumers with other emerging consumer tanks globinfo freexchange The general conclusions from the report The Future of Jobs , of the 2016 World Economic Forum, leave little room for optimistic thoughts about the future. They reflect what already most of us have realized: that the combination of the current socio-economic model with the rapid hyper-automation of production, lead to further imbalance and inequality in favor of the very few. As Stephen Hawking mentioned recently: “ If machines produce everything we need, the outcome will depend on how things are distributed. Everyone can enjoy a life of luxurious leisure if the machine-produced wealth is shared, or most people can end up miserably poor if the machine-owners successfully lobby against wealth redistribution. So far, the trend seems to be toward the seco...
Danny Haiphong Donald Trump's war on BRICS is backfiring as the Russia & China-led Global South moves to dump the US dollar and build a new order independent of its dictates. Journalist and geopolitical analyst Ben Norton breaks it all down. Related: Trump's tariffs: A unique opportunity for BRICS and the Global South to fully escape from dollar tyranny
globinfo freexchange Wolfgang Schäuble and the German leadership of the eurozone have good reasons to worry, maintaining an uncompromising attitude in the negotiations with Greece. But the repayment of Greek debt, which amounts to EUR 317 billion, is not one of the most important ones. The Greek debt is insignificant in comparison with the financial dynamite of the German (and other) banks, which in recent months gives more daily ignition signs. Only Deutsche Bank, the largest bank in Germany, is significantly exposed, holding dubious financial products known as "derivatives", worth 67 trillion euros. This amount is similar to the GDP of the entire world and 20 times greater than the GDP of Germany. Any comparison with the situation of the bank Lehman Brothers in 2008 would not be irrelevant. Just when Lehman Brothers went bankrupt, had available derivatives of only 31.5 trillion. The crisis of 2008 confirmed the concise definition of derivatives as proposed b...
Comments
Post a Comment