Skip to main content

Jeremy Corbyn should prepare the Labour Party for a fierce battle with the neoliberal regime


Jeremy Corbyn's speech at the end of the recent Labor Party conference was on the right direction. Corbyn mentioned all the necessary steps that need to be taken so that one of the motherlands of ruthless neoliberalism change course, away from the destructive policies dictated by the neoliberal doctrine.

Leo Panitch, scholar and Professor Emeritus of Political Science at York University spoke to Sharmini Peries and The Real News, pointing that Corbyn's speech was "full of confidence":

           It was a great speech. full of confidence. When he was first surprisingly elected leader just over two years ago, he wasn't used to being in the limelight in that way, and his speech was often halting. But he's a conviction politician and now that he has the wind behind him and he has strong evidence that his message is in fact shifting the ground of British politics, he is full of confidence. It was a brilliant speech. He made a number of speeches like that, which were televised, at the beginning of the election campaign and that had an electrifying effect on the campaign.

           He only mentioned in passing what had been stressed earlier in the week by other shadow ministers. But the most important of which is a public investment bank, a national one, supplemented by regional investment banks where the public sector, the government, would take the lead in investment. Addressing the fact that everywhere since the 2008 crisis, there's been a recovery of profits but not a recovery of investment. He says that a Labor government will take the lead in that. He also says that they will re-nationalize some key industries: railway, water. energy. Moreover, that many public services that were expanded through the public sector, through what is known as Private Finance Initiatives, the equivalent of PPPs in North America, will be clawed back. They've been inefficiently developed. This is hospitals, this is the NHS, this is schools, etc.

Yet, Panitch warned:

           That's the centerpiece of it, it's not socialism. Those of us who wish Corbyn the best should not put ourselves in the position of imagining it's going to be easy. The reaction, even though it's not socialism, from the Confederation of British Industry, from the City, from the banks, have already been, "Oh my god. This is going to undermine private enterprise," It's far from that, but they will face enormous opposition. We shouldn't put the kind of emphasis on what they can immediately achieve that would lead us to then be disappointed in a way we were when SYRIZA was elected in Greece. We need to realize their limitations, and when he says, "We're ready", you just had him quoted as saying, "We're ready for government", they're not ready. Who could be ready to take on the kind of powers that be? They haven't built yet, although they, as he said, massively shifted the center ground of British politics. That was the most important element of his speech. He isn't yet ready. They haven't built the base in the labor party, branches in the trade unions, to win the kind of support from people when, if I can use the expression,” the crap will hit the fan,” when all of the opposition to even these relatively moderate attempts to increase the state's public sector role in the economy, will be opposed by both foreign and domestic capital.


Indeed, Corbyn should take a lesson of what happened in Greece with Tsipras and SYRIZA. They went with good will to the negotiations with Greece's creditors and suffered a heavy defeat. Greece paid a huge price as became a debt colony in the hands of the corporate neo-colonialists.

For four decades, the neoliberal regime has taken over governments, institutions, minds. It is a powerful establishment that seeks to drive Europe into the new Feudalism. To overthrow such a powerful regime one needs a good strategy and determination.

Angela Merkel is now the main carrier of the neoliberal mission in Europe. Although she lost significant power in the latest elections, she has the opportunity to build the necessary coalitions in order to finish the job in her last term in power.

Corbyn should take advantage of Brexit to drive the UK to the opposite direction. While the Brussels-Berlin axis will seek to implement all the conditions of the Greek experiment inside the EU, the Labour party under Corbyn could become an example against this dark future. While Tsipras suffered a heavy defeat as went unprepared in the battle with the ruthless neoliberal priesthood, Corbyn should go to the battle with the neoliberal regime after a good preparation and a well-constructed plan.

This means that the Labour Party should build strong alliances inside the UK, especially with workers' unions and small-medium businesses. The Party should start a well-organized campaign across the country to make all the workers unite against the neoliberal agenda of the Tories. Corbyn should speak to the small-medium business owners to make them realize that the neoliberal model is their enemy as it only benefits the big multinational monsters against the small-medium sector.

However, one of the first and most important moves that Corbyn should do after his election is to nationalize central bank. The global financial mafia inside and outside the UK will find very difficult to fight any government that fully controls the central bank, and therefore, the money supply and circulation. A public investment bank that would lead public investments, as Corbyn mentioned, is very important, but not enough.

Of course, you never announce openly that you are planning to make such a crucial move because the criminal financial syndicate will finish you before you even start. In any case, Jeremy Corbyn should prepare the Labour Party for a fierce battle with the neoliberal regime.

Read also:

Comments

  1. Anonymous29/9/17 11:39

    If Jeremy Corbyn is elected as UK Prime Minister, will the last person to leave the country please turn off the lights?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I doubt the lights will be on by then, no one would have any money to pay for their electricity bill, or anything else for that matter.

      Delete
  2. As we see from the above comment, too many have already bought into the rightwing view of the world.

    They see clearly the inequity, but are persuaded, by the very same beneficiaries of those inequities who own the press, that their is no other option.

    For decades the press has pushed the electorate further and further right. Our only real hope are youngsters, who see Labour's ideas as exciting and possible. Not the tired and weary older generation who are afraid for what they have worked hard to acquire and have been convinced will be at risk if we move to the left.

    Our generation made this mess and we seem very reluctant to let it go, time to get out of the way and let the next generation apply a little hope to the situation or face a future of perpetual austerity and inequality...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The belief that everyone is is equal and should have the same amount of money is reminiscent of "animal farm", and they found out it didn't work either.

      Taxing the rich was tried in the 60's and 70's and led to a flight of capital and the rich.

      In short, if you are rich enough, tax is optional and voluntary, you only have to look at Jensen Button and Lewis Hamilton amongst others that live in Monaco mainly for tax reasons.

      Companies (large corporations) have the same choice, and many relocate to Ireland (CT rate 12.5%) and Luxembourg (CT rate 11%)

      To believe you van simply tax the rich and corporations to death is pure fantasy economics.

      If McDonnell has admitted his policies will cause a run on the £, the flight of capital and companies and yet people such as yourself won't accept that more state spending requires taxes to be raised on lower and middle income people, the sad fact is they are for the most part stuck here.

      Nice try, but no cigar.

      Delete
  3. Those policies were all tried in the 1970s and all failed. Its why we became the sick man of Europe. There may be a good argument for tighter control over natural monopolies such as Water, power etc. But state investment in a mature economy is unlikely to work. Better to put more into basic science and especially education and training so people can take part in the future world.

    They talked of taxing robots, but that is taxing innovation. encourage robot and A development and deal with any consequences later when we really know what they will be. Otherwise we will just be a backwater where even more peopel end up in dead end low paid jobs or begging in the streets.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Those policies were all tried in the 1970s". No. 70s mark the start of the neoliberal doctrine domination that brought us into this situation today: financial crises, fraud, growing inequality, unemployment, bubble economies, poverty, etc.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Zionists pushed Trump into the war with Iran but this was not the primary reason for this catastrophic decision

by system failure     It is widely reported by various analysts that Trump's catastrophic decision to start a war with Iran, came as a result of the pressure from Netanyahu regime and the Zionist lobby in US. While we can't ignore the strong influence of the Zionist factor on Trump and its significant role on dragging him into such a catastrophe, this was probably not the primary reason for the latest US-Iran war.  One has to look first at Venezuela and the unprecedented and rather bizarre operation there to remove Nicolas Maduro from power, in order to understand the deeper reasoning behind such a risky decision by Trump against Iran. The uniqueness of the operation in Venezuela by the US imperialist beast, has to do not only with the blatant violation of international law with almost zero pretexts, but also with the fact that the rest of the Maduro administration was left untouched and permitted to remain in power. This shows that the primary goal of this operation was ...

Trump CAVES On Uranium & Ballistic Missiles!

The Jimmy Dore Show   Jimmy Dore and Glenn Greenwald argue that President Trump is engaging in a stark retreat from earlier hardline positions on Iran by signaling acceptance of both Iranian uranium enrichment for civilian energy purposes and allowing Iran to possess conventional ballistic missiles. The two contend that these comments amount to major concessions, with Jimmy describing them as “another big win for Iran” and evidence that the administration has abandoned key objectives it previously promoted. Greenwald cites the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, arguing that Iran has the same right as other signatory nations to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes and notes that previous agreements imposed unusually strict inspections on Iran’s program. The segment emphasizes Trump’s remarks that “it’s a little bit unfair for them not to have some” ballistic missiles and that restrictions on civilian nuclear energy require “a little common sense.” 

Israeli Military Analyst: IDF "Lost & D*ing In Great Numbers" in Lebanon

Katie Halper   Haim Bresheeth Zabner, ex Israeli military analyst explains why Hezbollah is so superior to the IDF. He says, "the IDF are lost and dying in great numbers in Lebanon. He also notes that Hezbollah are "amazing fighters". Haim Bresheeth Zabnner was Professor of Media and Cultural Studies at University of East London and then a Professorial Research Associate at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS).He is Filmmaker, photographer, film studies scholar, and historian. His films include “A State of Danger,” a documentary on the first Palestinian Intifada. His books include "An Army Like No Other: How the Israel Defense Force Made a Nation."    Haim is the son of two Holocaust survivors and was raised in Israel. He is a member of Holocaust survivors and Descendents Against the Genocide and a founding member of Jewish Network for Palestine. On November 4, Haim was arrested over a speech he gave at a pro Palestine demonstration outside the res...

It's official: Iran won the war, and the US lost - This is how

Geopolitical Economy Report  The US government has signed an agreement to end its war on Iran. It is now widely admitted that Washington lost, and Tehran won. Ben Norton explains why Donald Trump failed, and how this has massive geopolitical implications for the Global South.

Israel CAUGHT Spying On Trump & HERE’S WHY!

The Jimmy Dore Show   What does Donald Trump do to stop Netanyahu, or punish Netanyahu, after he openly defies him and after Donald Trump knows that Israel's intelligence services are spying on him? It appears that he has done nothing.  

IRAN WAR: How Israel HIJACKED Trump & Lost the Middle East

Double Down News  

Προβλέψεις ...

GR elections Update (15/9): Αναθεωρημένες προβλέψεις (μετά το δεύτερο debate): ΣΥΡΙΖΑ 28-30% ΛΑΕ + ΣΧΕΔΙΟ Β' κ.λ.π. 20-23% ΝΔ 11-13% ΧΑ 6-8% ΚΚΕ 5-5,5% ΕΝΩΣΗ ΚΕΝΤΡΩΩΝ 2,5-3% ΠΟΤΑΜΙ 2,5-3,5% ΠΑΣΟΚ + ΔΗΜΑΡ 3-4% ΑΝΕΛ 2,5-3,5% Update (11/9): Αναθεωρημένες προβλέψεις (μετά το πρώτο debate): ΣΥΡΙΖΑ 25-28% ΛΑΕ + ΣΧΕΔΙΟ Β' κ.λ.π. 20-23% ΝΔ 11-13% ΧΑ 6-8% ΚΚΕ 5-5,5% ΕΝΩΣΗ ΚΕΝΤΡΩΩΝ 3,5-4% ΠΟΤΑΜΙ 2,5-3,5% ΠΑΣΟΚ + ΔΗΜΑΡ 3-4% ΑΝΕΛ 2,5-3,5% Update (04/9): Αναθεωρημένες προβλέψεις: ΣΥΡΙΖΑ 23-25% ΛΑΕ + ΣΧΕΔΙΟ Β' κ.λ.π. 20-23% ΝΔ 12-15% ΧΑ 6-8% ΚΚΕ 5-5,5% ΕΝΩΣΗ ΚΕΝΤΡΩΩΝ 3,5-4% ΠΟΤΑΜΙ 2,5-3,5% ΠΑΣΟΚ 3-4% ΑΝΕΛ 2,5-3,5% Update (29/8): Αναθεωρημένες προβλέψεις: ΣΥΡΙΖΑ 23-25% ΛΑΕ + ΣΧΕΔΙΟ Β' κ.λ.π. 20-23% ΝΔ 12-15% ΧΑ 6-8% ΚΚΕ 5-5,5% ΕΝΩΣΗ ΚΕΝΤΡΩΩΝ 4-4,5% ΠΟΤΑΜΙ 4-4,5% ΠΑΣΟΚ 3-4% ΑΝΕΛ 2,5-3,5% Update : Αναθεωρημένες προβλέψεις: ΣΥΡΙΖΑ 26-27% ...

Congress Members Run & REFUSE To Say They’re America First!

The Jimmy Dore Show   Jimmy Dore and his live panel show guests react to a video of a reporter asking members of Congress whether they care more about the American people or Israel, repeatedly getting stonewalling or obfuscation from the lawmakers who appeared unwilling to give a direct answer. The discussion focuses on the influence of pro-Israel lobbying groups in U.S. politics, with the panel claiming that organizations such as AIPAC exert significant pressure on elected officials through campaign spending and primary challenges.    Dore highlights the one lawmaker who plainly answered, "American people," while mocking others who responded that the interests of the United States and Israel are inseparable, including one who said, "They're equal. We are tied together as one." The segment ultimately argues that there is a growing disconnect between the many Americans who are increasingly questioning U.S.-Israel policy and members of Congress who bend over backw...

How Western societies lost their faith in Vision

Why people don't rise up massively today? Why there are no real revolutions? How we tolerate all things that have been imposed to us? These questions come up in people's minds more and more often today in Greece and abroad, due to the economic crisis. Some theories are circulated as an answer, among these, explanations which include, for example, the psychosynthesis of modern Greeks, but the truth is that there is something more fundamental behind this passive behaviour and concerns not only Greece, but the entire Western world. by system failure Prior to the beginning of the 20th century, Friedrich Nietzsche declares God's death and Western world will put all its hopes in science. Laplace's Determinism leads to the almighty man, who through science, can find all the answers for the world. Technology, which naturally comes from scientific discoveries, promises prosperity and a better life for the majority. Science becomes the central "pylon...

Iranian Professor Vali Nasr Reveals the TRUTH of Iran War

Cyrus Janssen  Professor Vali Nasr is one of the world’s leading experts on Iran, the Middle East, and U.S. foreign policy. In this exclusive interview, Nasr explains why the recent conflict may have strengthened Iran rather than weakened it, what Washington continues to misunderstand about Tehran, and whether the region has entered a new geopolitical era. They discuss Iran’s nuclear ambitions, the country’s relationship with China, America’s changing position in the world, and why 2026 could become a turning point for the Middle East.