Skip to main content

How will they try to crush Bernie?

As Bernie Sanders frequently refers to Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) during his speeches, it would be worth to examine a few things on how the corporate establishment tried to fight back, when Roosevelt took the presidency. How the current establishment will try to crush Bernie in case he get elected?

globinfo freexchange

The mouthpieces of the US establishment must be feeling now quite nervous, seeing Bernie Sanders coming literally from nowhere to take the presidency. One can identify a growing embarrassment and confusion by the mainstream media, which shows that they don't know what to do to break the stormily rising popularity of Bernie Sanders within the U.S. electorate. Many poor journalists probably receive huge pressure by the media hierarchy all over the top, to do whatever they can, to present Sanders as a non-reliable candidate for the US presidency.

As already mentioned in previous article, the powerful establishment in the US will do whatever it takes to force Sanders to comply with the "business as usual" agenda, and force him to withdraw his promises for a real change towards the benefit of the majority. But Bernie shows that he will not be an easy target. With the wide and constant support of the American people, he has a good chance to win the battle and bring a real change.

As Bernie frequently refers to Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) during his speeches, it would be worth to examine a few things on how the corporate establishment tried to fight back, when Roosevelt took the presidency. Some interesting and useful information can be found in the first part of the exceptional documentary The Century of the Self by Adam Curtis.

As Curtis describes, Freud's nerphew, Edward Bernays, was the first person to take Freud's ideas about human beings and use them to manipulate the masses. He showed American corporations for the first time, how they could make people want things they didn't need by linking mass produced goods to their unconscious desires. Out of this would come a new political idea of how to control the masses. By satisfying people's inner selfish desires one made them happy and thus docile. It was the start of the all-consuming self which has come to dominate our world today.

Roosevelt believed it was possible to explain his policies to ordinary Americans and to take into account their opinions. To do this, he was helped by the new ideas of an American social scientist called George Gallup.

Gallup and Fortune Magazines analyst Elmo Roper, rejected Bernays' view that human beings were at the mercy of unconscious forces and so needed to be controlled. Their system of opinion polling was based on the idea that people could be trusted to know what they wanted. They argued that one could measure and predict the opinions and behavior of the public if one asked strictly factual questions and avoided manipulating their emotions.

What Roosevelt was doing was forging a new connection between the masses and politicians. No longer were they irrational consumers who were managed by sating their desires, instead, they were sensible citizens who could take part in the governing of the country. In 1936 Roosevelt stood for re-election. He promised further control over big business. To the corporations it was the beginning of a dictatorship. But Roosevelt was triumphantly re-elected.

Faced with this, business now decided to fight back, to regain power in America. At the heart of the battle would be Edward Bernays and the profession he had invented, public relations.

According to the Historian of Public Relations Stuart Ewen, following that election, business people started to get together and started to carry on discussions, primarily in private and they started talking to each other about the need to sort of carry on ideological warfare against the New Deal. And to sort of reassert the sort of connectedness between the idea of democracy on the one hand and the idea of privately owned business on the other. And so, under the umbrella of an organization which still exists, which is called The National Association of Manufacturers and whose membership included all of the major corporations of the United States, a campaign was launched explicitly designed to create emotional attachments between the public and big business; it was Bernays' techniques that had been used totally on a grand scale.

In response to the campaign, the government made films that warned of the unscrupulous manipulation of the press by big business. And the central villain was the new figure of the public relations man. The films also showed how the responsible citizens could monitor the press themselves. They could create a chart that analyzed the reporting for signs of hidden bias. But such earnest instruction was to be no match for the powerful imagination of Edward Bernays. He was about to help create a vision of the utopia that free market capitalism would build in America if it was unleashed.

In 1939, New York hosted the World's Fair. Edward Bernays was a central adviser. He insisted that the theme be the link between democracy and American business. At the heart of the fair was a giant white dome that Bernays named "Democra-City", and the central exhibit was a vast working model of America's future constructed by the General Motors corporation.

According to Ann Bernays, daughter of Edward Bernays, the World's Fair was an opportunity for him to keep the status quo. That is, capitalism in a democracy, democracy and capitalism and that marriage. He did that by manipulating people and getting them to think that you couldn't have real democracy in anything but a capitalist society which was capable of doing anything; of creating these wonderful highways, of making moving pictures inside everybody's house, of telephones that didn't need chords, of sleek roadsters. It was consumerist but at the same time you inferred that in a funny way that democracy and capitalism went together.

That system today is probably more complex and powerful. After nearly four decades of domination of the neoliberal doctrine in favor of the financial and corporate elites, people learned to worship the free market and hate the state.

However, the system also shows serious signs of saturation. After repeated financial disasters, free market has been proved a fairy tale. At the end, big banks are rescued by the state, while the powerful corporate lobbyists don't hesitate to mobilize the internal government channels in order even to start wars, to increase their profits. That's because the state has been completely occupied by these private lobbyists. Sanders wants to change that and retake the state for the benefit of the people.

Sanders today speaks about Socialism and social policies, but his popularity rises. Surely, this activates a warning alarm to the establishment, which seeks to maintain current status quo by any means. But today, public relations is not something new and unknown. What will the establishment do? Does it have another Bernays in its sleeve, who has already a new method to manipulate the masses? Or is it time for an open class war?

Read also:

Comments

  1. I like this assessment of Sanders as "the next Ronald Reagan". After the cringe, you will find it to be surprisingly on-the-mark.
    http://www.salon.com/2016/01/25/bernie_sanders_could_be_the_next_ronald_reagan/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is a fundamental ideological difference between Sanders and Reagan. Actually the most fundamental of all: Reagan together with Thatcher were fanatic promoters of the neoliberal doctrine, while on the contrary, Sanders will seek to destroy it.

      Delete
  2. Anonymous29/1/16 18:13

    the rich elites also tried having a coup d'etat but picked the wrong General to run it - Smedley Butler - the american military would have followed him - he instead learned their plans and informed the administration - a believer in the constitution. interesting as how you don't read about this in American history books or how nobody went to jail for treason. Notice this article doesn't mention it. interesting to speculate on what would have happened if they had decided on Mac Arthur to lead the coup.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous29/1/16 18:17

    But don't worry. Even if Bernie wins the election and actually tries to deliver on real change - just remember what happened to last real reformers from the 60's that had real power.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sanders says he is a Socialist and his popularity rises. That's a huge progress for the US status quo under the neoliberal dictatorship that has demonized the term for decades. Whether he will prove it, depends on whether he manage to beat the establishment with the power of the American people.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I enjoyed the article, but I still worry that Sen. Sanders may be a
    deflection to energize the Democratic base and increase support
    from non-voters up to the time when he fails to gain the nomination
    and throws his substantial support to Mrs Clinton. Remember,
    Democrats are every bit as devious as Republicans. I learned that
    from Mr. Obama.

    ReplyDelete
  6. hipocampelofantocame, We can't exclude such a scenario, but I think it is highly improbable.

    First because Sanders in the debates don't hesitate to point his fundamental differences with Clinton (wall street funding, approval of the Iraq war).

    Second, because the dynamic he gains so far does not seem to be controllable and it doesn't looks like he want to control it in favor of Hillary.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Regardless how many now Support Sanders, you can not count on many of them to support HC.

    ReplyDelete
  8. GailStorm31/1/16 03:07

    Sanders' biggest problem isn't convincing voters. He comes across quite well in that regard. Instead, it is that they will pin something on him. The fix is too deep. That became obvious when Howard Dean stormed onto the scene. We got a video with highly doctored audio that had zero newsworthiness (does anyone believe Howard Dean is unhinged?) but the media gave it priority one attention. That's a fix inside the media. It was not remotely news. They'll find something with Sanders, most likely made-up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous1/2/16 18:09

      They'll have a hard row to hoe trying to sink Bernie. Look at the great job they're doing with Trump, a more feared candidate than even Bernie. It was a different day when they torpedoed Dean. Social media wasn't a factor like today and Bernie has too long and consistent a history to be sunk with a fabricated scandal. Now something more violent? That, I would have some concerns about, given how many nuts we have in the U.S..

      Delete
  9. Yes Saddlequest, yes to Sanders, a cold day in hell to switch vote to HRC.
    Send to war crimes trial, yes, not for, not for my life.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous21/2/16 07:07

    Same here, NEVER

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Operation Mindfuck: The origins of the Illuminati conspiracy fraud and how it became popular in our times

From the new documentary Can 't Get You Out of My Head by Adam Curtis   globinfo freexchange   The first settlers had come from Europe to America to flee from the corruption of power in the Old World. But although they had got away from the old power, they hadn't got away from their suspicious minds, and alone, out in the vast wilderness of the new America, that led them to imagining dark, hidden conspiracies in their own government, far away in Washington.    One of the first of these, in the early 19th century, said that a secret group from Europe, called the Bavarian Illuminati, were running a giant conspiracy in America to destroy the new democracy. In reality, the Illuminati had been a utopian movement who wanted to replace religion with reason. But instead, they now became the first of a series of frightening suspicions that fed off the isolation of the settlers in the New World.    One night (in 1958, somewhere in the vicinity of Whittier, Califo...

US Warships Under Fire: Iran Hits Back & Blasts UAE

MintPress News  "PROJECT FREEDOM." Trump calls it humanitarian aid. We call it what he already admitted it is: piracy. On Friday, Trump boasted that US forces seizing Iranian ships and oil were "sort of like pirates, but we are not playing games."  By Sunday, he had rebranded the blockade as "Project Freedom"—a military escort operation to guide ships through the Strait of Hormuz. Today, that operation went live: 15,000 US troops, guided-missile destroyers, and over 100 aircraft are enforcing American "freedom" at gunpoint. Let's be clear: Washington didn't enter the Strait to defend commerce. It entered to monopolize commerce—to maintain imperial control over the world's oil arteries and strangle Iran's economy.  Iran knows this. That's why closing the Strait and establishing its own transit protocols remains its strongest card in the fight for self-determination. When Trump confessed to piracy, he wasn't joking. He was c...

“Russia & China Preparing For War With The US!”

The Jimmy Dore Show   Colonel Douglas Macgregor explains that as a result of recent military conflicts, Russia, China, and Iran have become allies, and that Beijing and Moscow have concluded that "if we let Iran fail, we're next on the menu" from what he describes as a "rogue state led by a rogue personality," meaning they will intervene to prevent Iran's collapse if the US threatens it. He tells Jimmy Dore that Putin called Trump for an hour and a half to make it clear that a military campaign in Iran would not succeed and would make the situation much worse, offering to store Iran's enriched uranium as a diplomatic gesture. Macgregor warns that if the US restarts the war, China could send 40 or 50 surface combatants and submarines to the Indian Ocean, and Russia could fly MiG-31s into Iranian airspace — not to provoke a direct confrontation but to "make a point." He concludes that the British Empire overreached and overextended with World War...

How 'Liberal' Media Sold You Mass Murder & Genocide

Secular Talk    

Russia & China Now OPENLY Backing Iran!

The Jimmy Dore Show    

A response to misinformation on Nicaragua: it was a coup, not a ‘massacre’

There is so much misinformation in mainstream corporate media about recent events in Nicaragua that it is a pity that Mary Ellsberg’s article for Pulse has added to it with a seemingly leftish critique. Ellsberg claims that recent articles, including from this website, often “ paint a picture of the crisis in Nicaragua that is dangerously misleading. ” Unfortunately, her own article does just that. It looks at the situation entirely from the perspective of those opposing Daniel Ortega’s government while whitewashing their malevolent behavior and downplaying the levels of US support they have relied on. Her piece is an incomplete depiction of what is happening on the ground, ignoring many salient facts that have come to light and which have been outdated by recent events. The following is a brief response to Ellsberg’s main points from someone who lives in Nicaragua and has observed the situation directly and intimately: https://grayzoneproject.com/2018/08/15/a-res...

Οι ιδιώτες 'επενδυτές' ως η μόνη επιλογή για ανάκαμψη: άλλο ένα παραμύθι του νεοφιλελέ κατεστημένου

Άλλη μια 'ιερή αγελάδα' της νεοφιλελεύθερης χούντας που κανείς δεν επιτρέπεται ούτε καν να διανοηθεί να αμφισβητήσει του system failure Το Ελληνικό πείραμα διανύει ήδη τον έβδομο χρόνο του με την οικονομία ρημαγμένη και κανένα σημάδι ανάκαμψης στον ορίζοντα. Εκτός από την απόλυτη αποτυχία των νεοφιλελεύθερων πολιτικών που επιβλήθηκαν στην Ελλάδα από την Τρόικα της καταστροφής, έχει ενδιαφέρον κανείς να εξετάσει και τον τρόπο που τα νεοφιλελεύθερα αφηγήματα έχουν επηρεάσει σε μεγάλο βαθμό την κοινή γνώμη, με αποτέλεσμα να καταλήγουν αναπόσπαστο κομμάτι ενός στρεβλού ορθολογισμού μέσα στις κοινωνίες. Η διαδικασία αυτή γίνεται με όχημα, κυρίως, την προπαγάνδα και την πλύση εγκεφάλου από τα ΜΜΕ και το πολιτικό κατεστημένο. Ένα από τα κεντρικά κλισέ των φερέφωνων του νεοφιλελευθερισμού στην Ελλάδα και αλλού αφορά την απόλυτη αναγκαιότητα των ιδιωτών 'επενδυτών' για την ανάκαμψη της οικονομίας. Τα ιδιωτικά κυρίαρχα μίντια και το πολιτικό κατεστημένο κατ...

Why the US pressured the UAE to leave OPEC: Big Oil corporations benefit

Geopolitical Economy Report   OPEC, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, is in crisis after the United Arab Emirates (UAE), its third-largest producer, left the group. Donald Trump openly praised the decision, saying it is good for the United States. Ben Norton explains why the US government opposes OPEC, which is rooted in the Third World nationalist movements of the 1960s, which sought more economic resources for the Global South. The USA wants its Big Oil corporations to dominate the industry.

Iran’s Secret Weapon: The Undersea Cables That Could Shake the Global Economy

GVS Deep Dive   Iran’s pressure over the Strait of Hormuz may no longer be limited to oil tankers, naval routes, and energy prices. New reports suggest Tehran is considering control over undersea internet cables passing through Hormuz, potentially requiring permits, fees, Iranian law, and Iranian companies for repair and maintenance. This video breaks down why the Strait of Hormuz is not only an oil chokepoint, but also a digital chokepoint connecting Europe, the Gulf, and Asia. Beneath the waters that carry global energy flows are fiber-optic cables carrying banking data, cloud services, AI traffic, telecom networks, financial messaging, and e-commerce. If Iran turns Hormuz into a digital leverage point, the consequences could reach far beyond the Gulf. 

From Moscow to Beijing: Eye on good neighbors with deep people-to-people ties

CGTN   Russian President Vladimir Putin has wrapped up his state visit to China. The bilateral meeting in Beijing has led to the extension of the 25-year-long Treaty of Good-Neighborliness and Friendly Cooperation, with high political mutual trust the backbone. Meanwhile, China and Russia issued a joint statement on promoting a multipolar world and a new type of international relations. What does the China-Russia relationship seriously mean to the two countries and to the world?