As
Bernie Sanders frequently refers to Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR)
during his speeches, it would be worth to examine a few things on how
the corporate establishment tried to fight back, when Roosevelt took
the presidency. How the current establishment will try to crush
Bernie in case he get elected?
globinfo
freexchange
The
mouthpieces of the US establishment must be feeling now quite nervous, seeing Bernie Sanders coming literally from nowhere to take
the presidency. One can identify
a growing embarrassment and confusion by the mainstream media, which
shows that they don't know what to do to break the stormily rising
popularity of Bernie Sanders within the U.S. electorate. Many poor
journalists probably receive huge pressure by the media hierarchy all
over the top, to do whatever they can, to present Sanders as a
non-reliable candidate for the US presidency.
As
already mentioned in previous article,
the powerful establishment in the US will do whatever it takes to
force Sanders to comply with the "business as usual"
agenda, and force him to withdraw his promises for a real change
towards the benefit of the majority. But Bernie shows that he will
not be an easy target. With the wide and constant support of the
American people, he has a good chance to win the battle and bring a
real change.
As
Bernie frequently refers to Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) during his
speeches, it would be worth to examine a few things on how the
corporate establishment tried to fight back, when Roosevelt took the
presidency. Some interesting and useful information can be found in
the first part of the exceptional documentary The Century of the Self by Adam Curtis.
As
Curtis describes, Freud's nerphew, Edward Bernays, was the first
person to take Freud's ideas about human beings and use them to
manipulate the masses. He showed American corporations for the first
time, how they could make people want things they didn't need by
linking mass produced goods to their unconscious desires. Out of this
would come a new political idea of how to control the masses. By
satisfying people's inner selfish desires one made them happy and
thus docile. It was the start of the all-consuming self which has
come to dominate our world today.
Roosevelt
believed it was possible to explain his policies to ordinary
Americans and to take into account their opinions. To do this, he was
helped by the new ideas of an American social scientist called George
Gallup.
Gallup
and Fortune Magazines analyst Elmo Roper, rejected Bernays' view that
human beings were at the mercy of unconscious forces and so needed to
be controlled. Their system of opinion polling was based on the idea
that people could be trusted to know what they wanted. They argued
that one could measure and predict the opinions and behavior of the
public if one asked strictly factual questions and avoided
manipulating their emotions.
What
Roosevelt was doing was forging a new connection between the masses
and politicians. No longer were they irrational consumers who were
managed by sating their desires, instead, they were sensible citizens
who could take part in the governing of the country. In 1936
Roosevelt stood for re-election. He promised further control over big
business. To the corporations it was the beginning of a dictatorship.
But Roosevelt was triumphantly re-elected.
Faced
with this, business now decided to fight back, to regain power in
America. At the heart of the battle would be Edward Bernays and the
profession he had invented, public relations.
According
to the Historian of Public Relations Stuart Ewen, following that
election, business people started to get together and started to
carry on discussions, primarily in private and they started talking
to each other about the need to sort of carry on ideological warfare
against the New Deal. And to sort of reassert the sort of
connectedness between the idea of democracy on the one hand and the
idea of privately owned business on the other. And so, under the
umbrella of an organization which still exists, which is called The
National Association of Manufacturers and whose membership included
all of the major corporations of the United States, a campaign was
launched explicitly designed to create emotional attachments between
the public and big business; it was Bernays' techniques that had been
used totally on a grand scale.
In
response to the campaign, the government made films that warned of
the unscrupulous manipulation of the press by big business. And the
central villain was the new figure of the public relations man. The
films also showed how the responsible citizens could monitor the
press themselves. They could create a chart that analyzed the
reporting for signs of hidden bias. But such earnest instruction was
to be no match for the powerful imagination of Edward Bernays. He was
about to help create a vision of the utopia that free market
capitalism would build in America if it was unleashed.
In
1939, New York hosted the World's Fair. Edward Bernays was a central
adviser. He insisted that the theme be the link between democracy and
American business. At the heart of the fair was a giant white dome
that Bernays named "Democra-City", and the central exhibit
was a vast working model of America's future constructed by the
General Motors corporation.
According
to Ann Bernays, daughter of Edward Bernays, the World's Fair was an
opportunity for him to keep the status quo. That is, capitalism in a
democracy, democracy and capitalism and that marriage. He did that by
manipulating people and getting them to think that you couldn't have
real democracy in anything but a capitalist society which was capable
of doing anything; of creating these wonderful highways, of making
moving pictures inside everybody's house, of telephones that didn't
need chords, of sleek roadsters. It was consumerist but at the same
time you inferred that in a funny way that democracy and capitalism
went together.
That
system today is probably more complex and powerful. After nearly four
decades of domination of the neoliberal doctrine in favor of the
financial and corporate elites, people learned to worship the free
market and hate the state.
However,
the system also shows serious signs of saturation. After repeated
financial disasters, free market has been proved a fairy tale. At the
end, big banks are rescued by the state, while the powerful corporate
lobbyists don't hesitate to mobilize the internal government channels
in order even to start wars, to increase their profits. That's
because the state has been completely occupied by these private
lobbyists. Sanders wants to change that and retake the state for the
benefit of the people.
Sanders
today speaks about Socialism and social policies, but his popularity
rises. Surely, this activates a warning alarm to the establishment,
which seeks to maintain current status quo by any means. But today,
public relations is not something new and unknown. What will the
establishment do? Does it have another Bernays in its sleeve, who has
already a new method to manipulate the masses? Or is it time for an
open class war?
Read
also:
I like this assessment of Sanders as "the next Ronald Reagan". After the cringe, you will find it to be surprisingly on-the-mark.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.salon.com/2016/01/25/bernie_sanders_could_be_the_next_ronald_reagan/
There is a fundamental ideological difference between Sanders and Reagan. Actually the most fundamental of all: Reagan together with Thatcher were fanatic promoters of the neoliberal doctrine, while on the contrary, Sanders will seek to destroy it.
Deletethe rich elites also tried having a coup d'etat but picked the wrong General to run it - Smedley Butler - the american military would have followed him - he instead learned their plans and informed the administration - a believer in the constitution. interesting as how you don't read about this in American history books or how nobody went to jail for treason. Notice this article doesn't mention it. interesting to speculate on what would have happened if they had decided on Mac Arthur to lead the coup.
ReplyDeleteBut don't worry. Even if Bernie wins the election and actually tries to deliver on real change - just remember what happened to last real reformers from the 60's that had real power.
ReplyDeleteSanders says he is a Socialist and his popularity rises. That's a huge progress for the US status quo under the neoliberal dictatorship that has demonized the term for decades. Whether he will prove it, depends on whether he manage to beat the establishment with the power of the American people.
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed the article, but I still worry that Sen. Sanders may be a
ReplyDeletedeflection to energize the Democratic base and increase support
from non-voters up to the time when he fails to gain the nomination
and throws his substantial support to Mrs Clinton. Remember,
Democrats are every bit as devious as Republicans. I learned that
from Mr. Obama.
hipocampelofantocame, We can't exclude such a scenario, but I think it is highly improbable.
ReplyDeleteFirst because Sanders in the debates don't hesitate to point his fundamental differences with Clinton (wall street funding, approval of the Iraq war).
Second, because the dynamic he gains so far does not seem to be controllable and it doesn't looks like he want to control it in favor of Hillary.
Regardless how many now Support Sanders, you can not count on many of them to support HC.
ReplyDeleteSanders' biggest problem isn't convincing voters. He comes across quite well in that regard. Instead, it is that they will pin something on him. The fix is too deep. That became obvious when Howard Dean stormed onto the scene. We got a video with highly doctored audio that had zero newsworthiness (does anyone believe Howard Dean is unhinged?) but the media gave it priority one attention. That's a fix inside the media. It was not remotely news. They'll find something with Sanders, most likely made-up.
ReplyDeleteThey'll have a hard row to hoe trying to sink Bernie. Look at the great job they're doing with Trump, a more feared candidate than even Bernie. It was a different day when they torpedoed Dean. Social media wasn't a factor like today and Bernie has too long and consistent a history to be sunk with a fabricated scandal. Now something more violent? That, I would have some concerns about, given how many nuts we have in the U.S..
DeleteYes Saddlequest, yes to Sanders, a cold day in hell to switch vote to HRC.
ReplyDeleteSend to war crimes trial, yes, not for, not for my life.
Same here, NEVER
ReplyDelete